Arm vein conduit is superior to composite prosthetic-autogenous grafts in lower extremity revascularization

被引:45
作者
Faries, PL [1 ]
LoGerfo, FW [1 ]
Arora, S [1 ]
Pulling, MC [1 ]
Rohan, DI [1 ]
Akbari, CM [1 ]
Campbell, DR [1 ]
Gibbons, GW [1 ]
Pomposelli, FB [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg,Div Vasc Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mva.2000.106488
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Various alternative conduits have been used for lower extremity revascularization when an adequate ipsilateral greater saphenous vein is absent. This study compared the effectiveness of all-autogenous multisegment arm vein bypass grafts with that of composite grafts composed of combined prosthetic and autogenous conduits. Methods: One hundred fifty-three lower extremity revascularization procedures per formed between 1990 and 1998 were followed up prospectively using a computerized vascular registry. The grafts were composed of spliced arm vein segments with venovenostomy in 122 and of composite prosthetic-autogenous conduit in 31. Arm vein conduit was prepared by means of intraoperative angioscopy for valve lysis and identification of luminal abnormalities in 47.7% of cases. Results: Bypass graft configurations were as follows: femoropopliteal (12 arm vein, 2 composite); femorotibial (75 arm vein, 23 composite); femoropedal (14 arm vein, 6 composite), and popliteo-tibial/pedal (21 arm vein, 0 composite). The indication for surgery was limb salvage in 98% and disabling daudication in 2% of cases. The mean follow-up was 25.1 months (range, 1 month to 7.9 years). Overall survival at 4 years was 51%. Overall patency and limb salvage rates were as follows: primary patency, at 1 year-arm vein, 76.9% +/- 4.8%; composite, 59.5% +/- 9.6% (P = .02); at 3 years-arm vein, 70.0% +/- 8.0%; composite, 43.7% +/- 12.4% (P < .01); and at 5 years-arm vein, 53.8% +/- 8.7%; composite, 0%; secondary patency, at 1 year-arm vein, 77.5% +/- 4.6%; composite, 59.8% +/- 9.5% (P = .02); at 3 years-arm vein, 70.7% a 7.5%, composite, 44.9% +/- 13.1% (P < .01); at 5 years-arm vein, 57.7% +/- 8.0%; composite, 0%; limb salvage, at 1 year-arm vein, 89.3% +/- 3.7%; composite, 73.9% +/- 8.9% (P < .01); at 3 years-arm vein, 80.5% +/- 7.0%; composite, 49.6% +/- 14.3% (P < .01); at 5 years-arm vein, 76.3% +/- 9.9%; composite, 0%. Conclusion: In this study, multisegment autogenous arm vein was used successfully in a wide variety of lower extremity revascularization procedures and achieved good long-term patency and limb salvage rates, well in excess of those achieved with composite prosthetic-autogenous grafts. The use of autogenous conduit appears to offer superior results to composite conduit in lower extremity revascularization. The superior durability of arm vein makes it one of the alternative conduits of choice when an adequate greater saphenous vein is not available.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1126
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] ARM VEINS FOR ARTERIAL REVASCULARIZATION OF THE LEG - ARTERIOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
    ANDROS, G
    HARRIS, RW
    SALLESCUNHA, SX
    DULAWA, LB
    OBLATH, RW
    APYAN, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1986, 4 (05) : 416 - 427
  • [2] BALSHI JD, 1989, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V124, P1078
  • [3] Infrainguinal arterial reconstruction with nonreversed greater saphenous vein
    Belkin, M
    Knox, J
    Donaldson, MC
    Mannick, JA
    Whittemore, AD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 24 (06) : 957 - 962
  • [4] EXPERIENCE WITH INSITU SAPHENOUS-VEIN BYPASSES DURING 1981 TO 1989 - DETERMINANT FACTORS OF LONG-TERM PATENCY
    BERGAMINI, TM
    TOWNE, JB
    BANDYK, DF
    SEABROOK, GR
    SCHMITT, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1991, 13 (01) : 137 - 149
  • [5] Use of arm and lesser saphenous vein compared with prosthetic grafts for infrapopliteal arterial bypass: Are they worth the effort?
    Calligaro, KD
    Syrek, JR
    Dougherty, MJ
    Rua, I
    Raviola, CA
    DeLaurentis, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 26 (06) : 919 - 924
  • [6] Management and outcome of infrapopliteal arterial graft infections with distal graft involvement
    Calligaro, KD
    Veith, FJ
    Dougherty, MJ
    DeLaurentis, DA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 172 (02) : 178 - 180
  • [7] USE OF ARM VEINS IN FEMORAL-POPLITEAL BYPASS GRAFTS
    CAMPBELL, DR
    HOAR, CS
    GIBBONS, GW
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1979, 190 (06) : 740 - 742
  • [8] THE USE OF SPLICED VEIN BYPASSES FOR INFRAINGUINAL ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION
    CHANG, BB
    DARLING, RC
    BOCK, DEM
    SHAH, DM
    LEATHER, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 21 (03) : 403 - 410
  • [9] THE LONG-TERM VALUE OF COMPOSITE GRAFTS FOR LIMB SALVAGE
    CHANG, JB
    STEIN, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 22 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [10] The use of arm vein in lower-extremity revascularization: Results of 520 procedures performed in eight years
    Faries, PL
    Arora, S
    Pomposelli, FB
    Pulling, MC
    Smakowski, P
    Rohan, DI
    Gibbons, GW
    Akbari, CM
    Campbell, DR
    LoGerfo, FW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 31 (01) : 50 - 58