Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: A comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures

被引:40
作者
Debus, ES
Geiger, D
Sailer, M
Ederer, J
Thiede, A
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg
关键词
linear tensile strength; knot-breaking strength; knot-holding capacity;
D O I
10.1159/000129507
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Four different braided absorbable surgical materials (Dexon(R), Dexon II Bicolor(R), Vicryl(R) and Polysorb(R)) 2/0 USP, which basically share the same indications, were studied in vitro and in vivo with regard to their physical properties as well as tissue compatibility and surgical handling. Analyzing the results the authors tried to determine the most useful suture in surgical practice. Method: Physical tests to determine tensile strength, knot-breaking strength and knot security were carried out. Additionally an in vivo model (Wistar rat) was used to compare histocompatibility and loss of function due to hydrolytic resorption. Furthermore, a handling test was carried gut by trained surgeons. Results: Polysorb had the highest linear tensile strength but also the fastest loss of function following tissue implantation: whereas Vicryl showed the slowest loss of function. Similar results were obtained with regard to the knot-breaking strength. After pulsatile stressing Dexon II Bicolor and Dexon showed the highest irreversible elongation followed by Vicryl and Polysorb. Polysorb had the best knotting characteristics, scoring highest also in the handling study. Conclusions: The authors conclude that with Polysorb all features and properties of braided suture material have reached a high level of quality. This suture combines the positive characteristics of monofilament with those of multifilament materials, thus coming closest to being the ''optimal suture'.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 61
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   EARLY LOCAL STOMA COMPLICATIONS IN RELATION TO THE APPLIED SUTURE MATERIAL - COMPARISON BETWEEN MONOFILAMENT AND MULTIFILAMENT SUTURES [J].
BAGI, P ;
JENDRESEN, M ;
KIRKEGAARD, P .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1992, 35 (08) :739-742
[2]  
BOURNE RB, 1988, CAN J SURG, V31, P43
[3]   KNOTTING TECHNIQUE AND SUTURE MATERIALS [J].
BROWN, RP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (05) :399-400
[4]  
CHU CC, 1981, ANN SURG, V193, P365, DOI 10.1097/00000658-198103000-00021
[5]  
CHU CC, 1989, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V68, P233
[6]   EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ABSORBABLE SUTURES ON HEALING OF GASTROINTESTINAL ANASTOMOSES [J].
DEVENEY, KE ;
WAY, LW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1977, 133 (01) :86-94
[7]  
HOLMLUND EW, 1976, ANN SURG, V184, P189
[8]   EFFECT OF INTERRUPTED AND CONTINUOUS SUTURING ON INTESTINAL WOUND MARGIN STRENGTH IN RATS [J].
JONSSON, T ;
HOGSTROM, H ;
ZEDERFELDT, B .
EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1993, 25 (03) :169-173
[9]  
RIDDICK DH, 1977, FERTIL STERIL, V28, P1220
[10]  
SALTHOUSE TN, 1976, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V142, P544