Best-worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it

被引:526
作者
Flynn, Terry N.
Louviere, Jordan J.
Peters, Tim J.
Coast, Joanna
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, MRC, Hlth Serv Res Collaborat, Dept Social Med, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Study Choice, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Community Based Med, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Hlth Econ Facil, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
discrete choice experiments; utility; attribute importance;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Statements like "quality of care is more highly valued than waiting time" can neither be supported nor refuted by comparisons of utility parameters from a traditional discrete choice experiment (DCE). Best-worst scaling can overcome this problem because it asks respondents to perform a different choice task. However, whilst the nature of the best-worst task is generally understood, there are a number of issues relating to the design and analysis of a best-worst choice experiment that require further exposition. This paper illustrates how to aggregate and analyse such data and using a quality of life pilot study demonstrates how richer insights can be drawn by the use of best-worst tasks. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 189
页数:19
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Effects coding in discrete choice experiments [J].
Bech, M ;
Gyrd-Hansen, D .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (10) :1079-1083
[2]   ANALYSIS OF THE RELIABILITY OF PREFERENCE RANKING DATA [J].
BENAKIVA, M ;
MORIKAWA, T ;
SHIROISHI, F .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1991, 23 (03) :253-268
[3]   USE OF THE LOGIT SCALING APPROACH TO TEST FOR RANK-ORDER AND FATIGUE EFFECTS IN STATED PREFERENCE DATA [J].
BRADLEY, M ;
DALY, A .
TRANSPORTATION, 1994, 21 (02) :167-184
[4]   Using discrete choice modelling in priority setting: an application to clinical service developments [J].
Farrar, S ;
Ryan, M ;
Ross, D ;
Ludbrook, A .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 50 (01) :63-75
[5]   DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE TO EVIDENCE OF PUBLIC CONCERN - THE CASE OF FOOD SAFETY [J].
FINN, A ;
LOUVIERE, JJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY & MARKETING, 1992, 11 (02) :12-25
[7]   Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: Preferences or capabilities? [J].
Grewal, I ;
Lewis, J ;
Flynn, T ;
Brown, J ;
Bond, J ;
Coast, J .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 62 (08) :1891-1901
[8]  
HAUSMAN JA, 1987, J ECONOMETRICS, V34, P83, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(87)90068-6
[9]  
Hensher D, 1999, J ECONOMETRICS, V89, P197
[10]  
Louviere J., 1990, Leisure Sciences, V12, P9, DOI 10.1080/01490409009513087