Immunologic response to administration of standardized dog allergen extract at differing doses

被引:55
作者
Lent, Anne M. [1 ]
Harbeck, Ronald [1 ]
Strand, Matthew [1 ]
Sills, Michael [1 ]
Schmidt, Kimberly [1 ]
Efaw, Benjamin [1 ]
Lebo, Terri [1 ]
Nelson, Harold S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Jewish Med & Res Ctr, Div Clin Immunol & Allergy, Denver, CO 80206 USA
关键词
immunotherapy; acetone-precipitated dog extract; Can f1; cytokine; allergen-specific IgE; allergen-specific IgG(4); skill prick test; late cutaneous response;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.055
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The immunologic response to immunotherapy with dog extract is not well characterized. Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the immunologic response to 3 doses of dog extract expressed as their Can f 1 content. Methods: Cluster immunotherapy was administered to 28 patients with dog allergy who were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment arms: placebo or acetone-precipitated extract containing 0.6 mu g, 3.0 mu g, or 15.0 mu g Can f 1 per 0.5 mL maintenance dose. Studies included titrated skin prick tests, the late cutaneous response, titrated nasal challenge with dog extract, and serum allergen-specific IgE and IgG(4). Dog allergen-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation was performed with measurement of secreted cytokines by ELISA and of intracellular cytokines by flow cytometry. Results: There was a significant dose-dependent response in suppression of titrated skin prick tests and suppression of the late cutaneous response. There was a significant increase from baseline in dog-specific IgG4 in both the high-dose and low-dose groups and a dose-dependent suppression of secreted TNF-alpha and increase in secreted TGF-beta. There was a dose-dependent trend in suppression of secreted IL-4 with a significant decrease from baseline in the high-dose group. There were no significant changes in symptom scores; lymphocyte proliferation; secreted IFN-gamma, IL-10, or IL-5; or intracellular cytokine production. Conclusion: The dose-response in immunologic parameters after immunotherapy with dog extract is similar to that previously demonstrated with cat extract. Clinical implications: The greatest and most consistent response is seen with a dose containing 15 mu g Can f 1.
引用
收藏
页码:1249 / 1256
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Role of interleukin 10 in specific immunotherapy [J].
Akdis, CA ;
Blesken, T ;
Akdis, M ;
Wüthrich, B ;
Blaser, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1998, 102 (01) :98-106
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Practical nonparametric statistics
[3]   Do CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells hinder tumor immunotherapy? [J].
Antony, PA ;
Restifo, NP .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2002, 25 (03) :202-206
[4]   DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED IMMUNOTHERAPY WITH MIXED GRASS-POLLEN ALLERGOIDS .2. COMPARISON BETWEEN PARAMETERS ASSESSING THE EFFICACY OF IMMUNOTHERAPY [J].
BOUSQUET, J ;
MAASCH, H ;
MARTINOT, B ;
HEJJAOUI, A ;
WAHL, R ;
MICHEL, FB .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1988, 82 (03) :439-446
[5]   NASAL CHALLENGE WITH POLLEN GRAINS, SKIN-PRICK TESTS AND SPECIFIC IGE IN PATIENTS WITH GRASS-POLLEN ALLERGY [J].
BOUSQUET, J ;
LEBEL, B ;
DHIVERT, H ;
BATAILLE, Y ;
MARTINOT, B ;
MICHEL, FB .
CLINICAL ALLERGY, 1987, 17 (06) :529-536
[6]  
Chanez P, 1996, ALLERGY, V51, P850
[7]   DOSE-RESPONSE OF IGE AND IGG ANTIBODIES DURING RAGWEED IMMUNOTHERAPY [J].
CRETICOS, PS ;
VANMETRE, TE ;
MARDINEY, MR ;
ROSENBERG, GL ;
NORMAN, PS ;
ADKINSON, NF .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1984, 73 (01) :94-104
[8]   AFFINITY PURIFICATION OF A MAJOR AND A MINOR ALLERGEN FROM DOG EXTRACT - SEROLOGIC ACTIVITY OF AFFINITY-PURIFIED CAN-FI AND OF CAN-FI-DEPLETED EXTRACT [J].
DEGROOT, H ;
GOEI, KGH ;
VANSWIETEN, P ;
AALBERSE, RC .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1991, 87 (06) :1056-1065
[9]   A double-blind, placebo-controlled immunotherapy dose-response study with standardized cat extract [J].
Ewbank, PA ;
Murray, J ;
Sanders, K ;
Curran-Everett, D ;
Dreskin, S ;
Nelson, HS .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2003, 111 (01) :155-161
[10]  
GEHIHAR K, 1999, CLIN EXP ALLERGY, V29, P497