Disgust and the Moralization of Purity

被引:373
作者
Horberg, E. J. [1 ]
Oveis, Christopher [2 ]
Keltner, Dacher [1 ]
Cohen, Adam B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Inst Personal & Social Res, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
purity; disgust; moral judgment; emotion; socioeconomic status; EMOTIONS; ANGER; JUDGMENT; CONSERVATIVES; SENSITIVITY; MORALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1037/a0017423
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Guided by appraisal-based models of the influence of emotion upon judgment, we propose that disgust moralizes-that is, amplifies the moral significance of-protecting the purity of the body and soul. Three studies documented that state and trait disgust, but not other negative emotions, moralize the purity moral domain but not the moral domains of justice or harm/care. In Study 1, integral feelings of disgust, but not integral anger, predicted stronger moral condemnation of behaviors violating purity. In Study 2, experimentally induced disgust, compared with induced sadness, increased condemnation of behaviors violating purity and increased approval of behaviors upholding purity. In Study 3, trait disgust, but not trait anger or trait fear, predicted stronger condemnation of purity violations and greater approval of behaviors upholding purity. We found that, confirming the domain specificity of the disgust-purity association, disgust was unrelated to moral judgments about justice (Studies I and 2) or harm/care (Study 3). Finally, across studies, individuals of lower socioeconomic status (SES) were more likely than individuals of higher SES to moralize purity but not justice or harm/care.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 976
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Damasio Antonio R., 1994, Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
[2]   APPROACH WITHDRAWAL AND CEREBRAL ASYMMETRY - EMOTIONAL EXPRESSION AND BRAIN PHYSIOLOGY .1. [J].
DAVIDSON, RJ ;
SARON, CD ;
SENULIS, JA ;
EKMAN, P ;
FRIESEN, WV .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 58 (02) :330-341
[3]   Discrete emotions and persuasion: The role of emotion-induced expectancies [J].
DeSteno, D ;
Petty, RE ;
Rucker, DD ;
Wegener, DT ;
Braverman, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 86 (01) :43-56
[4]   Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations [J].
Graham, Jesse ;
Haidt, Jonathan ;
Nosek, Brian A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (05) :1029-1046
[5]   An attributional analysis of punishment goals and public reactions to O. J. Simpson [J].
Graham, S ;
Weiner, B ;
Zucker, GS .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1997, 23 (04) :331-346
[6]   How (and where) does moral judgment work? [J].
Greene, J ;
Haidt, J .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (12) :517-523
[7]   Anger, disgust, and presumption of harm as reactions to taboo-breaking Behaviors [J].
Gutierrez, Roberto ;
Giner-Sorolla, Roger .
EMOTION, 2007, 7 (04) :853-868
[8]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN SENSITIVITY TO DISGUST - A SCALE SAMPLING 7 DOMAINS OF DISGUST ELICITORS [J].
HAIDT, J ;
MCCAULEY, C ;
ROZIN, P .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1994, 16 (05) :701-713
[9]   The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment [J].
Haidt, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (04) :814-834
[10]  
Haidt J, 2003, SER AFFECTIVE SCI, P852