Constraints on two-body axial currents from reactor antineutrino-deuteron breakup reactions

被引:40
作者
Butler, M [1 ]
Chen, JW
Vogel, P
机构
[1] St Marys Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Halifax, NS B3H 3C3, Canada
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Phys, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] CALTECH, Dept Phys, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02868-X
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We discuss how to reduce theoretical uncertainties in the neutrino-deuteron breakup cross-sections crucial to the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory's efforts to,measure the solar neutrino flux. In effective field theory, the dominant uncertainties in all neutrino-deuteron reactions can be expressed through a single, common, isovector axial two-body current parameterized by L-1,L-A. Afterbriefly reviewing the status of fixing L-1,L-A experimentally, we present a constraint on L-1,L-A imposed by existing reactor antineutrino-deuteron breakup data. This constraint alone leads to an uncertainty of 6-7% at 7 MeV neutrino energy in the cross-sections relevant to the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. However, more significantly for the Sudbury experiment, the constraint implies an uncertainty of only 0.7% in the ratio of charged to neutral current cross-sections used to verify the existence of neutrino oscillations, at the same energy. This is the only direct experimental constraint from the two-body system, to date, of the uncertainty in these cross-sections. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 31
页数:6
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Measurement of the rate of νe+d →p+p+e- interactions produced by 8B solar neutrinos at the sudbury neutrino observatory -: art. no. 071301 [J].
Ahmad, QR ;
Allen, RC ;
Andersen, TC ;
Anglin, JD ;
Bühler, G ;
Barton, JC ;
Beier, EW ;
Bercovitch, M ;
Bigu, J ;
Biller, S ;
Black, RA ;
Blevis, I ;
Boardman, RJ ;
Boger, J ;
Bonvin, E ;
Boulay, MG ;
Bowler, MG ;
Bowles, TJ ;
Brice, SJ ;
Browne, MC ;
Bullard, TV ;
Burritt, TH ;
Cameron, K ;
Cameron, J ;
Chan, YD ;
Chen, M ;
Chen, HH ;
Chen, X ;
Chon, MC ;
Cleveland, BT ;
Clifford, ETH ;
Cowan, JHM ;
Cowen, DF ;
Cox, GA ;
Dai, Y ;
Dai, X ;
Dalnoki-Veress, F ;
Davidson, WF ;
Doe, PJ ;
Doucas, G ;
Dragowsky, MR ;
Duba, CA ;
Duncan, FA ;
Dunmore, J ;
Earle, ED ;
Elliott, SR ;
Evans, HC ;
Ewan, GT ;
Farine, J ;
Fergani, H .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2001, 87 (07) :71301-1
[2]  
AHMAD QR, NUCLEX0204009
[3]   The μ-d capture rate in effective field theory [J].
Ando, S ;
Park, TS ;
Kubodera, K ;
Myhrer, F .
PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2002, 533 (1-2) :25-36
[4]  
ANDO S, NUCLTH0206001
[5]  
Avignone FT, 2001, PROCEEDINGS OF THE CAROLINA SYMPOSIUM ON NEUTRINO PHYSICS, P214
[6]  
Beacom J. F., 2001, PHYS REV D, V64, DOI DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVD.64.091302
[7]   The potential of effective field theory in NN scattering [J].
Beane, SR ;
Cohen, TD ;
Phillips, DR .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1998, 632 (03) :445-469
[8]   Rearranging pionless effective field theory [J].
Beane, SR ;
Savage, MJ .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 2001, 694 (3-4) :511-524
[9]   Effective theory of the triton [J].
Bedaque, PF ;
Hammer, HW ;
van Kolck, U .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 2000, 676 :357-370
[10]   Effective theory for neutron-deuteron scattering: Energy dependence [J].
Bedaque, PF ;
Hammer, HW ;
van Kolck, U .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1998, 58 (02) :R641-R644