Dissociating neural indices of dynamic cognitive control in advance task-set preparation: An ERP study of task switching

被引:56
作者
Astle, D. E.
Jackson, G. M.
Swainson, R.
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Div Psychiat, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
task switching; ERPs; task set; cognitive control; executive function;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.092
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Switching between different tasks is associated with performance deficits, or 'switch costs', relative to repeating the same task. Recent evidence suggests that response rather than task selection processes may be a major cause of switch costs [Schuch, S., Koch, I., 2003. The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 29 (1) 92-105]. Thus, switch costs are not incurred if on the preceding trial a task has been prepared for but no response required (a 'no-go' trial). We investigated the relationship between response selection and the subsequent preparation of an alternative task set. While switch costs were absent following 'no-go' trials, ERP differences during the precueing interval showed that response selection has implications for subsequent task preparation as well as for task performance per se. The results are discussed in relation to the dissociation of intention versus action in behavioural control and the role of inhibition in switching between task sets. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 103
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Allport A., 1999, ATTENTION SPACE ACTI, P273
[2]  
ALLPORT A, 2000, ATTENTION PERFORM, P421
[3]   The preparation effect in task switching: Carryover of SOA [J].
Altmann, EM .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2004, 32 (01) :153-163
[4]   Functional decay of memory for tasks [J].
Altmann, EM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2002, 66 (04) :287-297
[5]   The Madrid card sorting test (MCST):: a task switching paradigm to study executive attention with event-related potentials [J].
Barceló, F .
BRAIN RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2003, 11 (01) :27-37
[6]   Who comes first? The role of the prefrontal and parietal cortex in cognitive control [J].
Brass, M ;
Ullsperger, M ;
Knoesche, TR ;
von Cramon, DY ;
Phillips, NA .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 17 (09) :1367-1375
[7]  
De Jong R, 2000, CONTROL OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES: ATTENTION AND PERFORMANCE XVIII, P357
[8]   Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goal-directed behavior [J].
Duncan, J ;
Emslie, H ;
Williams, P ;
Johnson, R ;
Freer, C .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 30 (03) :257-303
[9]   Short-term mobilization of processing resources is revealed in the event-related potential [J].
Falkenstein, M ;
Hoormann, J ;
Hohnsbein, J ;
Kleinsorge, T .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 40 (06) :914-923
[10]   Self-control during response conflict by human supplementary eye field [J].
Husain, M ;
Parton, A ;
Hodgson, TL ;
Mort, D ;
Rees, G .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (02) :117-118