Regional diastolic function by pulsed Doppler myocardial mapping for the detection of left ventricular ischemia during pharmacologic stress testing -: A comparison with stress echocardiography and perfusion scintigraphy

OBJECTIVES We evaluated regional diastolic function by pulsed Doppler myocardial mapping for the detection of left ventricular ischemia during pharmacologic stress testing. BACKGROUND Evaluation and quantification of diastolic myocardial function remain a challenge for imaging techniques in stress tests. METHODS A prospective study compared the detection of coronary artery stenosis: 1) by pulsed Doppler myocardial mapping, 2) by two-dimensional echocardiographic dobutamine stress test, and 3) by perfusion scintigraphy in 64 patients using coronary angiography for reference. An age matched subgroup of 10 patients with normal angiograms and two-dimensional echocardiographic stress test served as control group. Peak myocardial contraction velocity (V-c and lengthening rate during early diastolic left ventricular (LV) filling (V-E) were measured in 12 LV segments from three apical views. RESULTS In controls, myocardial velocities increased during stress by greater than or equal to 3.6 cm/s (p < 0.001). In LV segments depending on a stenosed artery (n = 70), V,decreased by greater than or equal to 1 cm/s and, thus, was different from control segments (n = 112, p < 0.001) and from scar segments (n = 13, p < 0.01). whereas the change of V-C was similar to that in scar segments. A stress induced 2 cm/s reduction of V, discerned the best diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 84%, specificity 93%) in comparison with two-dimensional echocardiography (78% and 71%) and perfusion scintigraphy (61% and 86%). Using receiver operating curves at incremental levels of luminal narrowing these relations persisted. CONCLUSIONS Quantification of diastolic myocardial function by pulsed Doppler myocardial mapping during dobutamine stress test was shown to be a feasible, accurate, reproducible, noninvasive technique that should be considered to be a sensitive alternative to the present echocardiographic and scintigraphic imaging techniques for stress tests. (C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiology.