Atomic force microscopy of scratch damage in polypropylene

被引:34
作者
Dasari, A
Duncan, SJ
Misra, RDK
机构
[1] Univ Louisiana, Dept Chem Engn, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA
[2] Basell Polyolefins, Milton Keynes MK1 1LZ, Bucks, England
关键词
D O I
10.1179/026708302225005945
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) in tapping mode has been used to characterise surface damage on deformed polypropylenes induced during a scratch test. Atomic force micrographs revealed differences in microstructures that could be used to predict the deformation resistance of two different types of polypropylene. The undeformed surface of the two types of polypropylene (identified as polypropylene-L and polypropylene-R) was characterised by differences in arrangement (regular or irregular) of fibrils depending on their melt flow conditions. Polypropylene-L is a polymer with longer chains and with restricted flow, whereas polypropylene-R has shorter chains obtained by controlled rheology. The microtibrils in undeformed polypropylene-L bend, forming raised surface features of height in the region of 10-50 nm. In comparison to polypropylene-L, the microfibrils in undeformed polypropylene-R exhibited surface features of relatively lower height (10 - 20 nm). 30 x 30 nm scan AFM images provided details of microlibrils containing chains of molecules of similar to 0.5 nm wide. Surface deformation induced by the scratch resulted in the formation of scratch tracks characterised by regions of quasi-periodic (consecutive) cracking. This type of deformation is attributed to higher applied loads or to higher contact strains. This is particularly important in semicrystalline polymers, where there is partial reorganisation of microstructure on the application of surface stresses because of their viscoelastic properties. Atomic force micrographs of mechanically deformed polypropylene-L and polypropylene-R at a scan size of 1 x 1 mum indicated a lesser amount of reorganisation of microstructure in polypropylene-L as compared with polypropylene-R. Surface profiles and section analysis of the AFM micrographs suggested that polypropylene-R is more scratch resistant in comparison to polypropylene-L under identical scratch test conditions, consistent with Raman spectroscopy observations of tensile deformed polypropylene.
引用
收藏
页码:1227 / 1234
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ALBRECHT TR, 1999, POLYM SCI, V74, P2243
[2]   Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection [J].
Ashby, MF .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2000, 48 (01) :359-369
[3]   Tapping mode and phase imaging of biaxially oriented polyester films [J].
Beake, BD ;
Leggett, GJ ;
Shipway, PH .
SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS, 2001, 31 (01) :39-45
[4]   Scratching maps for polymers [J].
Briscoe, BJ ;
Evans, PD ;
Pelillo, E ;
Sinha, SK .
WEAR, 1996, 200 (1-2) :137-147
[5]   Scratch hardness and deformation maps for polycarbonate and polyethylene [J].
Briscoe, BJ ;
Pelillo, E ;
Sinha, SK .
POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (24) :2996-3005
[6]  
Chu J, 1998, 43RD INTERNATIONAL SAMPE SYMPOSIUM AND EXHIBITION ON MATERIALS AND PROCESS AFFORDABILITY - KEYS TO THE FUTURE, VOL 43, P1149
[7]   Atomic force microscopy of plastically deformed polyethylene subjected to tensile deformation at varying strain rates [J].
Dasari, A ;
Duncan, SJ ;
Misra, RDK .
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 18 (06) :685-690
[8]  
DASARI A, IN PRESS MAT SCI TEC
[9]  
DUNCAN S, 1998, P 5 INT C THERM OL A, P106
[10]  
Gould SAC, 1999, J APPL POLYM SCI, V74, P2243, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991128)74:9<2243::AID-APP13>3.0.CO