Virtual inhibitory quotient predicts response to ritonavir boosting of indinavir-based therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with ongoing viremia

被引:57
作者
Shulman, N
Zolopa, A
Havlir, D
Hsu, A
Renz, C
Boller, S
Jiang, P
Rode, R
Gallant, J
Race, E
Kempf, DJ
Sun, E
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] Abbott Labs, Global Pharmaceut Res & Dev, Abbott Pk, IL USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ Texas, SW Med Sch, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AAC.46.12.3907-3916.2002
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Depending on the degree of underlying resistance present, optimization of the pharmacokinetics of protease inhibitors may result in improved virologic suppression. Thirty-seven human immunodeficiency virus (HM-infected subjects who had chronic detectable viremia and who were receiving 800 mg of indinavir three times a day (TID) were switched to 400 mg of indinavir BID with 400 mg of ritonavir two times a day (BID) for 48 weeks. Full pharmacokinetic evaluations were obtained for 12 subjects before the switch and 3 weeks after the switch. Combination therapy increased the indinavir predose concentrations in plasma by 6.47-fold, increased the minimum concentration in serum by 3.41-fold, and reduced the maximum concentration in serum by 57% without significantly changing the area under the plasma concentration-time curve at 24 h. At week 3, 58% (21 of 36) of the subjects for whom postbaseline measurements were available achieved a viral load in plasma of <50 copies/ml or a reduction from the baseline load of greater than or equal to0.5 log(10) copies/ml. Of these subjects, 82% (14 of 17) whose viruses had three or fewer protease inhibitor mutations and 88% (14 of 16) whose viruses had an indinavir virtual phenotypic susceptibility test of more than sixfold less than that for the baseline isolate were considered virologic responders. The indinavir virtual inhibitory quotient, which is a function of baseline indinavir phenotypic resistance (estimated by virtual phenotype) and the indinavir predose concentration in plasma achieved with indinavir-ritonavir combination therapy, was the best predictor of a viral load reduction. Sixteen subjects discontinued the study by week 48 due to adverse events, predominantly related to hyperlipidemia. Pharmacokinetic intensification of indinavir-based therapy with ritonavir reduced the viral loads in subjects but added toxicity. The virtual inhibitory quotient, which incorporates both baseline viral resistance and the level of drug exposure in plasma, was superior to either baseline resistance or drug exposure alone in predicting the virologic response.
引用
收藏
页码:3907 / 3916
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Indinavir concentrations and antiviral effect [J].
Acosta, EP ;
Henry, K ;
Baken, L ;
Page, LM ;
Fletcher, CV .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1999, 19 (06) :708-712
[2]  
Burger DM, 1998, ANTIVIR THER, V3, P215
[3]  
DeGruttola V, 2000, ANTIVIR THER, V5, P41
[4]   Urological complaints in relation to indinavir plasma concentrations in HIV-infected patients [J].
Dieleman, JP ;
Gyssens, IC ;
van der Ende, ME ;
de Marie, S ;
Burger, DM .
AIDS, 1999, 13 (04) :473-478
[5]   Relationship between efficacy, tolerance, and plasma drug concentration of ritonavir in children with advanced HIV infection [J].
Dumon, C ;
Solas, C ;
Thuret, I ;
Chambost, H ;
Lacarelle, B ;
Michel, G ;
Durand, A .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2000, 22 (04) :402-408
[6]   Importance of protease inhibitor plasma levels in HIV-infected patients treated with genotypic-guided therapy: pharmacological data from the Viradapt Study [J].
Durant, J ;
Clevenbergh, P ;
Garraffo, R ;
Halfon, P ;
Icard, S ;
Del Giudice, P ;
Montagne, N ;
Schapiro, JM ;
Dellamonica, P .
AIDS, 2000, 14 (10) :1333-1339
[7]   THE INHIBITORY QUOTIENT - A METHOD FOR INTERPRETING MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION DATA [J].
ELLNER, PD ;
NEU, HC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1981, 246 (14) :1575-1578
[8]   Comparative studies of two-times-daily versus three-times-daily indinavir in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine [J].
Haas, DW ;
Arathoon, E ;
Thompson, MA ;
Pedro, RD ;
Gallant, JE ;
Uip, DE ;
Currier, J ;
Noriega, LM ;
Lewi, DS ;
Uribe, P ;
Benetucci, J ;
Cahn, P ;
Paar, D ;
White, CA ;
Collier, AC ;
Ramirez-Ronda, CH ;
Harvey, C ;
Chung, M ;
Mehrotra, D ;
Chodakewitz, J ;
Nguyen, BY .
AIDS, 2000, 14 (13) :1973-1978
[9]   Activities of cefepime and five other antibiotics against nosocomial PER-1-type and/or OXA-10-type β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. -: J Antimicrob Chemother 1998; 42:269-270 [J].
Vahaboglu, H ;
Saribas, S ;
Akbal, H ;
Ozturk, R ;
Yucel, A .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 42 (02) :269-270
[10]   Pharmacokinetic interaction between ritonavir and indinavir in healthy volunteers [J].
Hsu, A ;
Granneman, GR ;
Cao, GL ;
Carothers, L ;
Japour, A ;
El-Shourbagy, T ;
Dennis, S ;
Berg, J ;
Erdman, K ;
Leonard, JM ;
Sun, EG .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 42 (11) :2784-2791