Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial

被引:328
作者
Moss, Sue M. [1 ]
Cuckle, Howard
Evans, Andy
Johns, Louise
Waller, Michael
Bobrow, Lynda
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Canc Screening Evaluat Unit, Sutton, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] City Hosp, Nottingham Breast Inst, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[4] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69834-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The efficacy of screening by mammography has been shown in randomised controlled trials in women aged 50 years and older, but is less dear in younger women. A meta-analysis of all previous trials showed a 15% mortality reduction in invited women aged 40-49 years at study entry, but this finding could be due in part to screening of women after age 50 years. The Age trial was designed to study the effect on mortality of inviting women for annual mammography from age 40 years. Methods 160 921 women aged 39-41 years were randomly assigned in the ratio 1:2 to an intervention group of annual mammography to age 48 years or to a control group of usual medical care. The trial was undertaken in 23 NHS breast-screening units in England, Wales, and Scotland. The primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle and compared mortality rates in the two groups at 10 years' follow-up. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN24647151. Findings At a mean follow-up of 10.7 years there was a reduction in breast-cancer mortality in the intervention group, in relative and absolute terms, which did not reach statistical significance (relative risk 0.83 [95% Cl 0.66-1.04], p=0.11; absolute risk reduction 0.40 per 1000 women invited to screening [95% Cl -0.07 to 0.87]). Mortality reduction adjusted for non-compliance in women actually screened was estimated as 24% (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.51-1.01). Interpretation Although the reduction in breast-cancer mortality observed in this trial is not significant, it is consistent with results of other trials of mammography alone in this age-group. Future decisions on screening policy should be informed by further follow-up from this trial and should take account of possible costs and harms as well as benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:2053 / 2060
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] *ADV COMM BREAST C, 2006, NHSBSP PUBL, V61
  • [2] 14 years of follow-up from the Edinbugh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening
    Alexander, FE
    Anderson, TJ
    Brown, HK
    Forrest, APM
    Hepburn, W
    Kirkpatrick, AE
    Muir, BB
    Prescott, RJ
    Smith, A
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 353 (9168) : 1903 - 1908
  • [3] Pathology characteristics that optimize outcome prediction of a breast screening trial
    Anderson, T. J.
    Alexander, F. E.
    Lamb, J.
    Smith, A.
    Forrest, A. P. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (04) : 487 - 492
  • [4] Andersson I, 1997, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P63
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1988, Periodic screening for breast cancer: The health insurance plan project and its sequel, 1963-1986
  • [6] The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial
    Bjurstam, N
    Björneld, L
    Warwick, J
    Sala, E
    Duffy, SW
    Nyström, L
    Walker, N
    Cahlin, E
    Eriksson, O
    Hafström, LO
    Lingaas, H
    Mattsson, J
    Persson, S
    Rudenstam, CM
    Salander, H
    Säve-Söderbergh, J
    Wahlin, T
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 97 (10) : 2387 - 2396
  • [7] Black WC, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P167, DOI 10.1093/jnci/94.3.167
  • [8] BLAMEY RW, 1996, BREAST, V5, P156
  • [9] The effect of changing from one to two views at incident (subsequent) screens in the NHS breast screening programme in England: impact on cancer detection and recall rates
    Blanks, RG
    Bennett, RL
    Patnick, J
    Cush, S
    Davison, C
    Moss, SM
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 60 (06) : 674 - 680
  • [10] Breslow N E, 1980, IARC Sci Publ, P5