Comparing bulk soil electrical conductivity determination using the DUALEM-1S and EM38-DD electromagnetic induction instruments

被引:92
作者
Abdu, H. [1 ]
Robinson, D. A.
Jones, S. B.
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dep Biol & Irrigat Engn, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dep Plants Soils & Biometeorol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2005.0394
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Earth conductivity instruments based on the principle of electromagnetic induction (EMI) are extensively used for mapping soil salinity and, increasingly, for mapping soil texture. Environmental variables such as temperature can impact sensor response beyond the effect of soil solution electrical conductivity. This study was conducted to compare the bulk soil electrical conductivity (ECa)-depth relationship between the DUALEM-1S and Geonics EM38-DD devices and to determine the effect of variable temperature environments on instrument response. The relationship of ECa to the depth below ground was investigated by raising each instrument in increments of 0.15 m up to 1.8 m above ground level. The effect of temperature on both instruments was investigated under two soil salinity levels at two sites. The instruments corresponded reasonably with theoretical models describing the ECa-depth relationships, which are primarily coil-orientation dependent. Under the effect of variable-temperature test conditions, both instruments were prone to a higher margin of error (10-40%) at lower ECa readings while the error became less significant (approximate to 5%) at higher ECa (> 100 mS m(-1)). The difference in response of the instruments can be ascribed to the temperature-dependent change in soil ECa due to a 20 degrees C diurnal temperature variation in addition to instrumental drift caused by temperature effects on the processing circuitry. The EM38-DD's real-time display and internal powering are its advantages while the lower priced DUALEM-1S does not need instrument calibration and can store data internally
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 196
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Differentiating soil types using electromagnetic conductivity and crop yield maps [J].
Anderson-Cook, CM ;
Alley, MM ;
Roygard, JKF ;
Khosla, R ;
Noble, RB ;
Doolittle, JA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2002, 66 (05) :1562-1570
[2]   Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture [J].
Corwin, DL ;
Lesch, SM .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2005, 46 (1-3) :11-43
[3]   Applications of apparent soil electrical conductivity in precision agriculture [J].
Corwin, DL ;
Plant, RE .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2005, 46 (1-3) :1-10
[4]  
Corwin DL, 2003, AGRON J, V95, P352, DOI 10.2134/agronj2003.0455
[5]   ESTABLISHING SOIL ELECTRICAL-CONDUCTIVITY - DEPTH RELATIONS FROM ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION MEASUREMENTS [J].
CORWIN, DL ;
RHOADES, JD .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1990, 21 (11-12) :861-901
[6]   AN IMPROVED TECHNIQUE FOR DETERMINING SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY-DEPTH RELATIONS FROM ABOVE-GROUND ELECTROMAGNETIC MEASUREMENTS [J].
CORWIN, DL ;
RHOADES, JD .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1982, 46 (03) :517-520
[7]  
DOOLITTLE JA, 1994, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V49, P572
[8]   Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: a review [J].
Friedman, SP .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2005, 46 (1-3) :45-70
[9]  
Hendrickx J.M.H., 2002, SSSA BOOK SER, P1297
[10]   ESTIMATING HERBICIDE PARTITION-COEFFICIENTS FROM ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION MEASUREMENTS [J].
JAYNES, DB ;
NOVAK, JM ;
MOORMAN, TB ;
CAMBARDELLA, CA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1995, 24 (01) :36-41