Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools

被引:767
作者
Hawkins, Paul C. D. [1 ]
Skillman, A. Geoffrey [1 ]
Nicholls, Anthony [1 ]
机构
[1] OpenEye Sci Software, Santa Fe, NM 87507 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/jm0603365
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Ligand docking is a widely used approach in virtual screening. In recent years a large number of publications have appeared in which docking tools are compared and evaluated for their effectiveness in virtual screening against a wide variety of protein targets. These studies have shown that the effectiveness of docking in virtual screening is highly variable due to a large number of possible confounding factors. Another class of method that has shown promise in virtual screening is the shape-based, ligand-centric approach. Several direct comparisons of docking with the shape-based tool ROCS have been conducted using data sets from some of these recent docking publications. The results show that a shape-based, ligand-centric approach is more consistent than, and often superior to, the protein-centric approach taken by docking.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 82
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Efficient generation, storage, and manipulation of fully flexible pharmacophore multiplets and their use in 3-D similarity searching [J].
Abrahamian, E ;
Fox, PC ;
Nærum, L ;
Christensen, IT ;
Thogersen, H ;
Clark, RD .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2003, 43 (02) :458-468
[2]   Virtual screening and scaffold hopping based on GRID molecular interaction fields [J].
Ahlström, MM ;
Ridderström, M ;
Luthman, K ;
Zamora, I .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2005, 45 (05) :1313-1323
[3]   Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview [J].
Baldi, P ;
Brunak, S ;
Chauvin, Y ;
Andersen, CAF ;
Nielsen, H .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2000, 16 (05) :412-424
[4]  
BERMAN HM, 2000, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V28, P325
[5]   Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations [J].
Bissantz, C ;
Folkers, G ;
Rognan, D .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 43 (25) :4759-4767
[6]   Assessing the performance of OMEGA with respect to retrieving bioactive conformations [J].
Boström, J ;
Greenwood, JR ;
Gottfries, J .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 2003, 21 (05) :449-462
[7]   Comparing protein-ligand docking programs is difficult [J].
Cole, JC ;
Murray, CW ;
Nissink, JWM ;
Taylor, RD ;
Taylor, R .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 60 (03) :325-332
[8]   Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools [J].
Cummings, MD ;
DesJarlais, RL ;
Gibbs, AC ;
Mohan, V ;
Jaeger, EP .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 48 (04) :962-976
[9]   Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B [J].
Doman, TN ;
McGovern, SL ;
Witherbee, BJ ;
Kasten, TP ;
Kurumbail, R ;
Stallings, WC ;
Connolly, DT ;
Shoichet, BK .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 45 (11) :2213-2221
[10]   Lessons in molecular recognition: The effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy [J].
Erickson, JA ;
Jalaie, M ;
Robertson, DH ;
Lewis, RA ;
Vieth, M .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (01) :45-55