Ideal AFROC and FROC Observers

被引:18
作者
Khurd, Parmeshwar [2 ]
Liu, Bin [1 ]
Gindi, Gene [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Radiol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] Siemens Corp Res, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (AFROC); Bayes risk; free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC); ideal observer; PERFORMANCE; LOCALIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; VALIDATION; SIGNALS; IMAGES; CURVE;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2009.2031840
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Detection of multiple lesions in images is a medically important task and free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) analyses and its variants, such as alternative FROC (AFROC) analyses, are commonly used to quantify performance in such tasks. However, ideal observers that optimize FROC or AFROC performance metrics have not yet been formulated in the general case. If available, such ideal observers may turn out to be valuable for imaging system optimization and in the design of computer aided diagnosis techniques for lesion detection in medical images. In this paper, we derive ideal AFROC and FROC observers. They are ideal in that they maximize, amongst all decision strategies, the area, or any partial area, under the associated AFROC or FROC curve. Calculation of observer performance for these ideal observers is computationally quite complex. We can reduce this complexity by considering forms of these observers that use false positive reports derived from signal-absent images only. We also consider a Bayes risk analysis for the multiple-signal detection task with an appropriate definition of costs. A general decision strategy that minimizes Bayes risk is derived. With particular cost constraints, this general decision strategy reduces to the decision strategy associated with the ideal AFROC or FROC observer.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 386
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Optimization and FROG analysis of rule-based detection schemes using a multiobjective approach [J].
Anastasio, MA ;
Kupinski, MA ;
Nishikawa, RM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (06) :1089-1093
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Foundations of Image Science
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, FUNDEMENTALS STAT SI
[4]  
Barrett HH, 1997, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V1230, P155
[5]  
BUNCH PC, 1978, J APPL PHOTOGR ENG, V4, P166
[6]   Analysis of location specific observer performance data: Validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method [J].
Chakraborty, Dev P. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (10) :1187-1193
[7]   Validation and Statistical Power Comparison of Methods for Analyzing Free-response Observer Performance Studies [J].
Chakraborty, Dev P. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (12) :1554-1566
[8]   Observer studies involving detection and localization: Modeling, analysis, and validation [J].
Chakraborty, DP ;
Berbaum, KS .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (08) :2313-2330
[9]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS OF FREE-RESPONSE RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (FROC) DATA [J].
CHAKRABORTY, DP .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :561-568
[10]   FREE-RESPONSE METHODOLOGY - ALTERNATE ANALYSIS AND A NEW OBSERVER-PERFORMANCE EXPERIMENT [J].
CHAKRABORTY, DP ;
WINTER, LHL .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (03) :873-881