A comparative numerical study between dissipative particle dynamics and smoothed particle hydrodynamics when applied to simple unsteady flows in microfluidics

被引:9
作者
Filipovic, Nenad [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ivanovic, Milos [1 ]
Kojic, Milos [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Res & Dev Ctr Bioengn, Kragujevac, Serbia
[2] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Mech Engn, Kragujevac, Serbia
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Houston, TX USA
关键词
DPD method; SPH method; Unsteady fluid flow; Accuracy of DPD and SPH methods;
D O I
10.1007/s10404-008-0379-0
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Laminar flows through channels, pipes and between two coaxial cylinders are of significant practical interest because they often appear in a wide range of industrial, environmental, and biological processes. Discrete particle modeling has increasingly been used in recent years and in this study we examined two of these methods: dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) and smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method when applied to (a) time-dependent, plane Poiseuille flow and (b) flow between two coaxial cylinders at low Reynolds numbers. The two examples presented in this paper give insight into different features of the two discrete particle methods. It was found that both methods give results with high accuracy, but CPU time is much larger (of order 10(2)-10(3) in the second example) for DPD than for SPH model. This difference is due to the fact that the number of time steps for the DPD model is much greater than for the SPH model (since thermal fluctuations are taken into account in the DPD model).
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 235
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Driven interfaces in disordered media: Determination of universality classes from experimental data
    Albert, R
    Barabasi, AL
    Carle, N
    Dougherty, A
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1998, 81 (14) : 2926 - 2929
  • [2] Anderson D.A., 1997, Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, V2nd ed.
  • [3] ELEMENT-FREE GALERKIN METHODS
    BELYTSCHKO, T
    LU, YY
    GU, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1994, 37 (02) : 229 - 256
  • [4] Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments
    Belytschko, T
    Krongauz, Y
    Organ, D
    Fleming, M
    Krysl, P
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1996, 139 (1-4) : 3 - 47
  • [5] Ordered porous materials for emerging applications
    Davis, ME
    [J]. NATURE, 2002, 417 (6891) : 813 - 821
  • [6] Dryden H.L., 1956, HYDRODYNAMICS
  • [7] STATISTICAL-MECHANICS OF DISSIPATIVE PARTICLE DYNAMICS
    ESPANOL, P
    WARREN, P
    [J]. EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 1995, 30 (04): : 191 - 196
  • [8] Smoothed dissipative particle dynamics -: art. no. 026705
    Español, P
    Revenga, M
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2003, 67 (02): : 12
  • [9] Dissipative particle dynamics simulation of flow generated by two rotating concentric cylinders: II. Lateral dissipative and random forces
    Filipovic, N.
    Haber, S.
    Kojic, M.
    Tsuda, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2008, 41 (03)
  • [10] Modelling thrombosis using dissipative particle dynamics method
    Filipovic, N.
    Kojic, M.
    Tsuda, A.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2008, 366 (1879): : 3265 - 3279