Consent for childhood cancer tissue banking in the UK: the effect of the Human Tissue Act 2004

被引:26
作者
McHale, Jean
Habiba, Marwan
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Cavers, Debbie
Heney, David
Pritchard-Jones, Kathy
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Hlth Sci, Leicester LE1 6TP, Leics, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Fac Law, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[3] Leicester Royal Infirm, Dept Canc Studies & Mol Med, Leicester, Leics, England
[4] Edinburgh Ctr Neurooncol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Leicester, Dept Med & Social Care Educ, Leicester, Leics, England
[6] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Paediat Oncol, Sutton, Surrey, England
[7] Inst Canc Res, Sutton, Surrey, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70077-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
The obtainment, storage, and use of human tissue taken from children for research purposes is an area that is notable for its complexity and legal uncertainties. In the UK, the controversy surrounding organ retention prompted radical legislative change in the form of the Human Tissue Act 2004, which came into force from September, 2006. This Review paper explores the effect of the Human Tissue Act on consent, in the context of childhood tissue banking. We take as our case study the UK Children's Cancer Study Group tumour bank. Although the Human Tissue Act provides a new, detailed statutory framework, it does not, by itself, resolve all the relevant issues in this area. Researchers and clinicians must, therefore, continue to work alongside the existing principles of common law relating to this issue. Consent for the removal of tumour tissue during a surgical procedure should be distinguished from consent for the retention of the tissue for future use in research or for other specified uses. Consent to surgery is regulated by the same common law procedures used for consent to treatment. By contrast, the requirements for consent to storage and specified uses of samples are predominantly, but not exclusively, regulated by the Human Tissue Act. Although the Human Tissue Act might, at first, seem to promote clarity, the new legislative provisions and resultant Codes of Practice on consent could possibly lead tumour banks to reassess the nature and process of obtaining consent for the use of samples from children in research.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 272
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2004, GENETIC DATABASES SO
[2]
[Anonymous], 2002, HUM BOD HUM CHOIC LA
[3]
[Anonymous], 2005, Rethinking experiences o f childhood cancer: A multidisciplinary approach to chronic childhood illness
[4]
[Anonymous], MED LAW REV
[5]
Brazier Margaret, 2004, Med Leg J, V72, P39
[6]
*BRIST ROYAL INF I, INQ MAN CAR CHILDR R
[7]
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, INT ETH GUID BIOM RE
[8]
Dixon-Woods M, 2006, CHRONIC ILLN, V2, P165, DOI 10.1179/174592006X129455
[9]
ELLIS J, 2003, MED LAW, V22, P357
[10]
The human tissue bill - Criminal sanctions linked to opaque legislation threaten research [J].
Furness, P ;
Sullivan, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7439) :533-534