Effect of chemoprophylaxis with an ivermectin sustained-release bolus on acquired resistance to gastrointestinal parasites in cattle

被引:13
作者
Claerebout, E
Hollanders, W
Dorny, P
Vercruysse, J
机构
[1] Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ghent, 9820 Merelbeke
[2] Schering-Plough, 1180 Brussels
关键词
D O I
10.1136/vr.141.17.441
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The influence of chemoprophylaxis with an ivermectin sustained-release bolus in the first grazing season on the resistance of cattle to gastrointestinal nematodes during the following grazing season was investigated, In 1993 and 1994 dairy replacement calves were either given one bolus at the start of their first grazing season or left untreated, The two groups were grazed separately on a pasture that was divided into two similar sized paddocks, Faecal egg counts, serum pepsinogen and antibody levels were measured to evaluate host-parasite contact, Pasture infection levels were estimated by pasture larval counts and worm counts in tracer calves, After winter housing the animals were monitored during their second grazing season on a pasture that was also divided into two similar sized paddocks, Acquired resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes was evaluated by faecal egg counts and weight gains, Again, pasture infection levels were determined and pepsinogen and antibody levels were measured, During the first grazing seasons gastrointestinal nematode infections were controlled very effectively by the bolus, as shown by the greater weight gains, the negligible faecal egg counts and the low serum pepsinogen and antibody levels in the treated calves, In contrast, all parameters showed extensive parasite-host contact in the untreated animals, The efficient prophylaxis in the treated groups resulted in low levels of larval contamination on the paddocks grazed by the treated animals, compared to moderate infection levels at the end of both first grazing seasons on the paddocks grazed by the untreated animals, During the second grazing seasons (1994 and 1995) the faecal egg output was low in all groups, Although in the previously treated animals faecal egg counts were consistently higher, the differences were minimal, resulting in comparable levels of larval contamination on both paddocks, Serum pepsinogen and antibody levels were not significantly different between the groups and indicated a similar level of larval uptake on both paddocks, No negative effect of the previous chemoprophylaxis on the clinical condition and the weight gain of the second season grazing animals was observed.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 445
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[2]   IMMUNITY OF IVERMECTIN TREATED CATTLE TO CHALLENGE FROM HELMINTH-PARASITES IN THE FOLLOWING SEASON [J].
ARMOUR, J ;
BAIRDEN, K ;
RYAN, WG .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1988, 122 (10) :223-225
[3]  
BERGHEN P, 1987, AM J VET RES, V48, P664
[4]   EFFECTS OF THE USE OF A MORANTEL SUSTAINED-RELEASE BOLUS IN 1ST AND 2ND YEAR GRAZING CATTLE [J].
BORGSTEEDE, FHM ;
KLOOSTERMAN, A ;
OOSTENDORP, D ;
VANTARRIJ, H .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 1985, 18 (01) :39-49
[5]   A FIELD-STUDY OF THE IVERMECTIN SUSTAINED-RELEASE BOLUS IN THE SEASONAL CONTROL OF GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODE PARASITISM IN 1ST SEASON GRAZING CALVES [J].
CLAEREBOUT, E ;
HOLLANDERS, W ;
DECOCK, H ;
VERCRUYSSE, J ;
HILDERSON, H .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1994, 17 (03) :232-236
[6]  
DOWNEY NE, 1993, IRISH J AGR FOOD RES, V32, P147
[7]  
FISHER MA, 1995, VET REC, V137, P581
[8]  
HERBERT IV, 1987, VET REC, V121, P536
[9]   INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS AND IMMUNITY TO BOVINE PARASITIC GASTROENTERITIS AND BRONCHITIS - PILOT-STUDIES USING AN OXFENDAZOLE PULSE RELEASE BOLUS [J].
JACOBS, DE ;
PITT, SR ;
FOSTER, J ;
FOX, MT .
RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1987, 43 (02) :273-275
[10]   COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF EARLY-SEASON PROPHYLAXIS USING IVERMECTIN WITH LUNGWORM VACCINATION IN THE CONTROL OF PARASITIC BRONCHITIS AND GASTROENTERITIS IN CATTLE [J].
JACOBS, DE ;
FOSTER, J ;
GOWLING, G ;
PILKINGTON, JG ;
FOX, MT ;
RYAN, WG .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 1989, 34 (1-2) :45-56