Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in nucleus cochlear implants

被引:32
作者
Dawson, P. W.
Vandali, A. E.
Knight, M. R.
Heasman, J. M.
机构
[1] Cochlear Ltd, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[2] Cooperat Res Ctr Cochlear Implant & Hearing Aid I, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180312651
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether expanded instantaneous input dynamic ranges (IIDRs) in the Nucleus cochlear implant system benefit speech perception in the laboratory and listening in the real world. Design: Until recently, Nucleus cochlear implants have used an IIDR of approximately 30 dB. In this study, an IIDR of 31 dB was compared with 46 dB and 56 dB in the SPEAR3 research processor with nine adult implant recipients. Subjects were given two, 2-wk blocks of take-home experience with each of the three IIDRs. A single IIDR setting was used in each trial period. During the take-home experience with the expanded IIDRs, subjects used two programs: a standard program (with clinically measured electrode dynamic ranges) and a program with adjusted thresholds (decreased T levels). After each block of take-home experience, speech perception testing was conducted for CNC words in quiet (at 45 dB and 55 dB SPL) and for CUNY sentences in the presence of multi-taker babble. Results: On average, CNC word recognition at low presentation levels was significantly better with the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDRs, compared with the 31 dB IIDR; however, there was no significant difference between the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDR conditions. These benefits were greater for standard programs than for reduced T level programs. For CUNY sentences in babble, group results indicated no significant difference in performance across IIDR. The three IIDRs were rated similarly in real-life listening situations, and two of the subjects expressed tolerance problems with the expanded standard IIDRs. Conclusions: IIDRs of 46 and 56 dB provided benefit in accessing low-level speech without a decrement in sentence perception in babble. Most subjects accepted the standard, wider IIDR programs in everyday life. No significant differences were found between the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDR programs.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 176
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, SENTENCE TEST SPEECH
[2]  
ANSI, 1969, AM NAT STAND METH CA
[3]  
ANSI, 1997, AM NAT STAND METH CA
[4]   THE DESIGN OF SPEECH COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS [J].
BERANEK, LL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTE OF RADIO ENGINEERS, 1947, 35 (09) :880-890
[5]   THE HEARING-AID INPUT - A PHONEMIC APPROACH TO ASSESSING THE SPECTRAL DISTRIBUTION OF SPEECH [J].
BOOTHROYD, A ;
ERICKSON, FN ;
MEDWETSKY, L .
EAR AND HEARING, 1994, 15 (06) :432-442
[6]   Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners [J].
Chatterjee, N ;
Fu, QJ ;
Shannon, RV .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 107 (03) :1637-1644
[7]  
Cosendai G, 2001, AUDIOLOGY, V40, P272
[8]   DISTRIBUTION OF SHORT-TERM RMS LEVELS IN CONVERSATIONAL SPEECH [J].
COX, RM ;
MATESICH, JS ;
MOORE, JN .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1988, 84 (03) :1100-1104
[9]  
*CRC HEAR, 2006, SPEAR3 PROD BRIEF 3
[10]   Statistical measurements on conversational speech [J].
Dunn, HK ;
White, SD .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1940, 11 (03) :278-288