Roundtable Discussion of Jennifer Lind's Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics

被引:4
作者
Glaser, Charles L. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Berger, Thomas U. [5 ]
Mochizuki, Mike M. [1 ]
Lind, Jennifer [6 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Elliott Sch Int Affairs, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Boston Univ, Dept Int Relat, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Govt, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
apology; memory; history; reconciliation; threat perception; Japan; Korea; Germany; World War II;
D O I
10.1017/S1598240800006706
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
How can Japan put its past behind? Scholars, journalists, and activists frequently argue that Japan cannot solve its "history problem" unless it follows West Germany's lead in offering contrition for World War 11 violence. Into this debate, Jennifer Lind's Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics offers an original and provocative contribution. Lind argues that while countries should acknowledge past atrocities, frequent public apologies can be domestically polarizing and diplomatically counterproductive. Sorry States outlines a theory of remembrance and threat perception and tests it in a comparative study of Japanese-South Korean and Franco-German relations after World War II. Its methods, data, and findings will interest not only East Asianists, but also scholars of international reconciliation and security studies more broadly. This roundtable presents three critical essays in addition to a response by the author. They discuss the mechanisms through which historical memory influences perceptions of threat, the relative weight of ideational versus material factors in threat perception, and whether changes in international norms and economic interdependence may increasingly pressure countries to confront past violence.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 368
页数:32
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GERMANS POLAND POLES
[2]  
Art David., 2006, POLITICS NAZI GERMAN
[3]  
Barkan Elazar., 2000, GUILT NATIONS RESTIT
[4]   Dueling realisms [J].
Brooks, SG .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 1997, 51 (03) :445-&
[5]  
Cha VictorD., 1999, ALIGNMENT DESPITE AN
[6]  
Dwyer Susan., 1999, ETHICS INT AFF, V13, P81, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.1999.tb00328.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1747-7093.1999.TB00328.X]
[7]  
Edelstein DM, 2002, SECUR STUD, V12, P1
[8]  
Gibney M, 2008, PA STUD HUM RIGHTS, P1
[9]  
GLASER CL, 1995, INT SECURITY, V19, P50
[10]  
GLASER CL, 2010, THEORY RATI IN PRESS