The benchmark dose approach in food risk assessment: Is it applicable and worthwhile?

被引:34
作者
Muri, Stefan D. [1 ]
Schlatter, Josef R. [1 ]
Brueschweiler, Beat J. [1 ]
机构
[1] FOPH, Nutr & Toxicol Risks Sect, CH-8004 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Dose-response modelling; Mycotoxins; Natural toxins; Pesticides; Probabilistic effect assessment; Quality of toxicity data; TOXICITY; GLYCOALKALOIDS; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fct.2009.08.002
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The benchmark dose (BMD) approach is being increasingly used in the area of food risk assessment because it offers several advantages compared to the conventional no-observed-adverse-effect-level approach. The aim of this work was to check the applicability of the BMD approach on toxicity data available from pesticides, mycotoxins and natural toxins. Based on toxicological evaluations, the pivotal study was identified. Detailed data from the original study were retrieved and used for BMD modelling. Twenty-five studies used for BMD modelling were analysed with regard to study design: total number of animals, number of dose levels, and spacing between dose levels. The quality of the modelled endpoints was evaluated according to the following aspects: BMD/BMDL ratio, test for goodness of fit and BMD in the range of dose levels. If one of these aspects was not fulfilled, the BMD derived from this endpoint was considered to be uncertain to some extent and corresponding modelled data sets were examined. The present work demonstrates that the BMD approach is in principle applicable to pesticides, mycotoxins, and natural toxins. Although large differences relating to data availability and data quality were noticed, 69 of 82 modelled endpoints (84%) fulfilled the three quality aspects of BMD modelling. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2906 / 2925
页数:20
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment Guidance of the Scientific Committee [J].
Barlow, Susan ;
Chesson, Andrew ;
Collins, John D. ;
Flynn, Albert ;
Hardy, Anthony ;
Jany, Klaus-Dieter ;
Knaap, Ada ;
Kuiper, Harry ;
Larsen, John-Christian ;
Lovell, David ;
Le Neindre, Pierre ;
Schans, Jan ;
Schlatter, Josef ;
Silano, Vittorio ;
Skerfving, Staffan ;
Vannier, Philippe .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (06)
[2]   Assessment of potential risk levels associated with US environmental protection agency reference values [J].
Castorina, R ;
Woodruff, TJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 111 (10) :1318-1325
[3]  
*DAN VET FOOD ADM, 2001, BASIS VERS 3 0
[4]   Critical effect sizes in toxicological risk assessment: a comprehensive and critical evaluation [J].
Dekkers, S ;
de Heer, C ;
Rennen, MAJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 10 (1-2) :33-52
[5]   Mathematical modelling and quantitative methods [J].
Edler, L ;
Poirier, K ;
Dourson, M ;
Kleiner, J ;
Mileson, B ;
Nordmann, H ;
Renwick, A ;
Slob, W ;
Walton, K ;
Würtzen, G .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2002, 40 (2-3) :283-326
[6]   THE EFFECTS OF ZEARALENONE ON REPRODUCTION IN SWINE .1. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INGESTED ZEARALENONE DOSE AND ANESTRUS IN NONPREGNANT, SEXUALLY MATURE GILTS [J].
EDWARDS, S ;
CANTLEY, TC ;
ROTTINGHAUS, GE ;
OSWEILER, GD ;
DAY, BN .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 1987, 28 (01) :43-49
[7]  
*EFSA, 2006, EFSA SCI C, V7
[8]  
*EFSA, 2005, EFSAQ2004020 SCI COM
[9]  
*EFSA, 2004, EFSAQ2003118
[10]  
EFSA, 2006, EFSAQ2005154