Assessment of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation following modification of a standard telephone-directed protocol

被引:30
作者
Deakin, Charles D.
Cheung, Spencer
Petley, Graham W.
Clewlow, Frank
机构
[1] S Cent Ambulance Serv NHS Trust, Hampshire Div, Winchester SO22 5DH, Hants, England
[2] Southampton Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Med Phys & Bioengn, Southampton SO16 6YD, Hants, England
关键词
bystander CPR; cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); telephone; Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System (AMPDS);
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.003
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100602 [中西医结合临床];
摘要
Introduction: Current Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System (AMPDS) V.11.1 telephone instructions are limited in their ability to produce correctly performed basic life support. The current telephone instructions were modified in an attempt to improve areas of poor CPR performance. Methods: Fifty subjects performed CPR on an instrumented adult manikin by following instructions modified from AMPDS V.11.1 instructions. Instructions were given by telephone from a different room. Results: No improvements were seen with opening the airway or delivering rescue breaths. The rate of chest compression improved from 52 to 81 min(-1) (P=0.004), although the depth of chest compression fell to 2.0cm compared with 3.2cm documented with the original AMPDS instructions (P=0.004). Instructions to put the telephone down while performing CPR improved all aspects of CPR. Discussion: The effective delivery of telephone-directed CPR to untrained bystanders is a complex process. Changing verbal instructions to improve the quality of CPR is not easy. Further work is urgently needed to strengthen this important link in the chain of survival. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 443
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
BYSTANDER CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION (CPR) IN OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST [J].
BOSSAERT, L ;
VANHOEYWEGHEN, R .
RESUSCITATION, 1989, 17 :S55-S69
[2]
CHEUNG S, IN PRESS RESUSCITATI
[3]
A comparison of manikin CPR performance by lay persons trained in three variations of basic life support guidelines [J].
Donnelly, P ;
Assar, D ;
Lester, C .
RESUSCITATION, 2000, 45 (03) :195-199
[4]
Evaluating CPR performance in basic life support: the VIDRAP protocol [J].
Donnelly, PD ;
Lester, CA ;
Morgan, CL ;
Assar, D .
RESUSCITATION, 1998, 36 (01) :51-57
[5]
Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An evaluation of efficacy amongst elderly [J].
Dorph, E ;
Wik, L ;
Steen, PA .
RESUSCITATION, 2003, 56 (03) :265-273
[6]
ADVANCED CARDIAC LIFE SUPPORT IN THE PREHOSPITAL SETTING - THE REYKJAVIK EXPERIENCE [J].
EINARSSON, O ;
JAKOBSSON, F ;
SIGURDSSON, G .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 225 (02) :129-135
[7]
Factors affecting short- and long-term prognosis among 1069 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and pulseless electrical activity [J].
Engdahl, J ;
Bång, A ;
Lindqvist, J ;
Herlitz, J .
RESUSCITATION, 2001, 51 (01) :17-25
[8]
European Resuscitation Council, 2000, RESUSCITATION, V46, P29
[9]
EFFECTIVENESS OF BYSTANDER CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION AND SURVIVAL FOLLOWING OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST [J].
GALLAGHER, EJ ;
LOMBARDI, G ;
GENNIS, P .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (24) :1922-1925
[10]
Factors impeding dispatcher-assisted telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation [J].
Hauff, SR ;
Rea, TD ;
Culley, LL ;
Kerry, F ;
Becker, L ;
Eisenberg, MS .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 42 (06) :731-737