Energy consumption and GHG emissions of six biofuel pathways by LCA in (the) People's Republic of China

被引:196
作者
Ou Xunmin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang Xiliang [1 ,3 ]
Chang Shiyan [1 ,3 ]
Guo Qingfang [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, CAERC, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, SPPM, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Energy Environm & Econ 3E, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
(the) People's Republic of China; Greenhouse gas; Energy consumption; Biofuel; Bio-ethanol; Bio-diesel; ALTERNATIVE AUTOMOTIVE FUEL; LIFE-CYCLE ENERGY; NET ENERGY; ETHANOL; ENVIRONMENT; EFFICIENCY; INVENTORY; THAILAND; LAND; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.045
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper presents life-cycle-analysis (LCA) energy consumption (EC) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of China's current six biofuel pathways, which are: corn-derived ethanol (CE); cassava-derived ethanol (KE); sweet sorghum-derived ethanol (SE): soybean-derived bio-diesel (SB); jatropha fruit-derived bio-diesel (JB); and used cooking oil (UCO)-derived bio-diesel (LIB). The tool utilized here is the WTW (Well-to-Wheels) module of Tsinghua-CA3EM model covering the entire lifecycle including: raw materials cultivation (or feedstock collection): fuel production; transportation and distribution; and application in automobile engines, compared with Conventional Petroleum-based gasoline and diesel Pathways (CPP). The results indicate: (1) the fossil energy inputs are about 1.0-1.5 times the energy contained in the fuel for the CE, SE and SB pathways, but 0.5-0.9 times for the KE, UB and JB pathways: (2) compared with CPP, the JB, KE and LIB pathways can reduce both fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions; the CE and SB pathways can only reduce fossil fuel consumption, but increase GHG emission: the SE pathway increases not only fossil fuel consumption but also GHG emission: and (3) the main factors inducing high EC and GHG emission levels include: high EC levels during the fuel production stage and high fertilizer application rates during the planting of raw feedstocks. Conclusions are that of the aforementioned biofuel pathways in (the) People's Republic of China: (1) only the JB, KE and UB pathways have energy-saving merits as indicated by the LCA energy inputs and outputs; (2) compared with CPP, all but the SE pathway reduces fossil fuel consumption. However, the SB and CE pathway increase GHG emission; (3) all six displace petroleum by utilizing more coal; and (4) feedstock productivity levels must be increased, and there must be a reduction in fertilizer utilization and EC consumption during the cultivation and transportation stages in order to achieve the goals of energy balance and GHG emission reduction. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S197 / S208
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
*AD HOC NEWS, CHIN BIOEN IND REP 2
[2]  
[Anonymous], STUD SCAL UP DEV LIQ
[3]   Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective - What determines this? [J].
Borjesson, Pal .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (05) :589-594
[4]  
*CATARC GM, 2007, WELL TO WHEELS AN EN
[5]  
CHAI QH, 2008, RES BIOMASS DERIVED
[6]  
CHANG SY, 2008, FORUM SCI TECHNOL CH, V5, P58
[7]  
CHENG Q, 2007, HEILONGJIANG GRAIN, V4, P26
[8]  
*CHIN CLIM CHANG R, 2000, CHIN CLIM CHANG RES
[9]  
*CHIN STAT BUR, 2008, CHIN AGR STAT YB 200
[10]  
*CHIN STAT BUR, 2008, CHIN EN STAT YB 2008