In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center

被引:15
作者
Barrey, Cedric [1 ,2 ]
Mosnier, Thomas [2 ]
Jund, Jerome [3 ]
Perrin, Gilles [1 ]
Skalli, Wafa [2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Neurol P Wertheimer, Dept Neurosurg, Lyon, France
[2] ENSAM, Lab Biomech Arts & Metiers ParisTech, Paris, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Reg Annecienne, Dept Biostat, Annecy, France
关键词
biomechanics; biomechanical testing; cervical spine; disc prosthesis; artificial disc; LEVEL INTRADISCAL PRESSURE; INTERBODY FUSION; FINITE-ELEMENT; FOLLOW-UP; SPINE; REPLACEMENT; ARTHROPLASTY; ADJACENT; MOTION; JOINT;
D O I
10.3171/2009.6.SPINE0949
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Object. Few biomechanical in vitro studies have reported the effects of disc replacement on motion and kinematics of the cervical spine. The purpose of this study was to analyze motion through 3D load-displacement curves before and after implantation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center; special focus was placed on coupled motion, which is a well-known aspect of normal cervical spine kinematics. Methods. Six human cervical spines were studied. There were 3 male and 3 female cadaveric specimens (mean age at death 68.5 +/- 5 years [range 54-74 years]). The specimens were evaluated sequentially in 2 different conditions: first they were tested intact, then the spinal specimens were tested after implantation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis, the Discocerv, at the C5-6 level. Pure moment loading was applied in flexion/extension, left and right axial rotation, and left and right lateral bending. All tests were performed under load control with a 3D measurement system. Results. No differences were found to be statistically significant after comparison of range of motion between intact and instrumented spines for all loading conditions. The mean range of motion for intact spines was 10.3 degrees in flexion/extension, 5.6 degrees in lateral bending, and 5.4 degrees in axial rotation; that for instrumented spines was 10.4, 5.2, and 4.8 degrees, respectively. No statistical difference was observed for the neutral zone nor stiffness between intact and instrumented spines. Finally, the coupled motions were also preserved during axial rotation and lateral bending, with no significant difference before and after implantation. Conclusions. This study demonstrated that, under specific testing conditions, a ball-and-socket joint with cranial geometrical center can restore motion in the 3 planes after discectomy in the cervical spine while maintaining physyological coupled motions during axial rotation and lateral bending. (DOI: 10.3171/2009.6.SPINE0949)
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 546
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
Cervical total disc replacement, part two: Clinical results [J].
Bertagnoli, R ;
Duggal, N ;
Pickett, GE ;
Wigfield, CC ;
Gill, SS ;
Karg, A ;
Voigt, S .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 36 (03) :355-+
[2]
Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement [J].
Bertagnoli, R ;
Yue, JJ ;
Pfeiffer, F ;
Fenk-Mayer, A ;
Lawrence, JP ;
Kershaw, T ;
Nanieva, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 2 (04) :403-410
[3]
Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics [J].
Bogduk, N ;
Mercer, S .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 15 (09) :633-648
[4]
Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion [J].
Chang, Ung-Kyu ;
Kim, Daniel H. ;
Lee, Max C. ;
Willenberg, Rafer ;
Kim, Se-Hoon ;
Lim, Jesse .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 7 (01) :33-39
[5]
DiAngelo Denis J, 2004, Neurosurg Focus, V17, pE7
[6]
Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate [J].
DiAngelo, DJ ;
Roberston, JT ;
Metcalf, NH ;
McVay, BJ ;
Davis, RC .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2003, 16 (04) :314-323
[7]
Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty -: An In Vitro human cadaveric model [J].
Dmitriev, AE ;
Cunningham, BW ;
Hu, NB ;
Sell, G ;
Vigna, F ;
McAfee, PC .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (10) :1165-1172
[8]
A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculo-skeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position : the EOS system [J].
Dubousset, J ;
Charpak, G ;
Dorion, I ;
Skalli, W ;
Lavaste, F ;
Deguise, J ;
Kalifa, G ;
Ferey, S .
BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2005, 189 (02) :287-297
[9]
Cervical total disc replacement, part I: Rationale, biomechanics, and implant types [J].
Durbhakula, MM ;
Ghiselli, G .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 36 (03) :349-+
[10]
Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion [J].
Eck, JC ;
Humphreys, SC ;
Lim, TH ;
Jeong, ST ;
Kim, JG ;
Hodges, SD ;
An, HS .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (22) :2431-2434