Immunohistochemistry can be used to subtype acute myeloid leukemia in routinely processed bone marrow biopsy specimens - Comparison with flow cytometry

被引:30
作者
Manaloor, EJ
Neiman, RS
Heilman, DK
Albitar, M
Casey, T
Vattuone, T
Kotylo, P
Orazi, A
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
acute myeloid leukemia; immunohistology; flow cytometry; French-American-British cooperative group classification;
D O I
10.1309/NALM-440G-4GFY-XPVE
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Flow cytometry (FC) is the preferred method of immunophenotyping acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However; there are situations in which FC is unavailable and in which immunohistologic staining of bone marrow biopsy specimens can be used to provide immunophenotypic information. To evaluate immunohistologic staining and to confirm its value, we selected 80 newly diagnosed cases of AmL that were classified according to French-American-British (FAB) criteria and confirmed by flow cytometric analysis for this study. Paraffin-embedded bone marrow specimens were stained using a panel of antibodies that included CD34 (QBEND10), antimyeloperoxidase (anti-MPO), antihemoglobin, factor VIII-related antigen, and 3 epitopes of CD 68 (HAM56, KP1, and PG-M1). Our findings suggest that with the use of the paraffin reactive antibodies CD34 (QBEND10), MPO, CD68 (PG-M1), antihemoglobin, and factor VIII-related antigen, immunohistochemistry can be used to subclassify AML. Comparison of immunohistochemical results with FC immunophenotyping suggests that there is significant concordance in the results for markers that can he used with both techniques, indicating that the sensitivity and specificity of both methods is comparable (P > .53 in all cases).
引用
收藏
页码:814 / 822
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
AGRESTI A, 1996, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA, P227
[2]  
Al Safadi L, 1998, ANTICANCER RES, V18, P3677
[3]  
[Anonymous], ADV PATHOL LAB MED
[4]  
Arber DA, 1996, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V106, P462
[5]  
BENE MC, 1995, LEUKEMIA, V9, P1783
[6]   PROPOSALS FOR CLASSIFICATION OF ACUTE LEUKEMIAS [J].
BENNETT, JM ;
CATOVSKY, D ;
DANIEL, MT ;
FLANDRIN, G ;
GALTON, DAG ;
GRALNICK, HR ;
SULTAN, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1976, 33 (04) :451-&
[7]   PROPOSAL FOR THE RECOGNITION OF MINIMALLY DIFFERENTIATED ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA (AML-MO) [J].
BENNETT, JM ;
CATOVSKY, D ;
DANIEL, MT ;
FLANDRIN, G ;
GALTON, DAG ;
GRALNICK, HR ;
SULTAN, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1991, 78 (03) :325-329
[8]   IMMUNOPHENOTYPING OF ACUTE-LEUKEMIA BY FLOW CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS - USE OF CD45 AND RIGHT-ANGLE LIGHT SCATTER TO GATE ON LEUKEMIC BLASTS IN 3-COLOR ANALYSIS [J].
BOROWITZ, MJ ;
GUENTHER, KL ;
SHULTS, KE ;
STELZER, GT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1993, 100 (05) :534-540
[9]   CLINICOPATHOLOGIC AND CYTOGENIC FEATURES OF CD34 (MY 10)-POSITIVE ACUTE NONLYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA [J].
BOROWITZ, MJ ;
GOCKERMAN, JP ;
MOORE, JO ;
CIVIN, CI ;
PAGE, SO ;
ROBERTSON, J ;
BIGNER, SH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1989, 91 (03) :265-270
[10]  
Chuang SS, 1997, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V107, P410