Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina

被引:429
作者
Hunt, W. F. [1 ]
Jarrett, A. R.
Smith, J. T.
Sharkey, L. J.
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] McKim & Creed, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
[3] CH2M Hill Inc, Raleigh, NC 27606 USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
stormwater management; best management practice; water quality; nutrient loads; North Carolina; hydrology; abatement and removal;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:6(600)
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Three bioretention field sites in North Carolina were examined for pollutant removal abilities and hydrologic performance. The cells varied by fill media type or drainage configuration. The field studies confirmed high annual total nitrogen mass removal rates at two conventionally drained bioretention cells (40% reduction each). Nitrate-nitrogen mass removal rates varied between 75 and 13%, and calculated annual mass removal of zinc, copper, and lead from one Greensboro cell were 98, 99, and 81%, respectively. All high mass removal rates were due to a substantial decrease in outflow volume. The ratio of volume of water leaving the bioretention cell versus that which entered the cell varied from 0.07 (summer) to 0.54 (winter). There was a significant (p < 0.05) change in the ratio of outflow volume to inflow volume when comparing warm seasons to winter. Cells using a fill soil media with a lower phosphorus index (P-index), Chapel Hill cell C1 and Greensboro cell G1, had much higher phosphorus removal than Greensboro cell G2, which used a high P-index fill media. Fill media selection is critical for total phosphorus removal, as fill media with a low P-index and relatively high CEC appear to remove phosphorus much more readily.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 608
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
*AM SIGM, 2003, US MAN SIGM 900 SIGM
[2]  
Amoozegar A., 1999, Agricultural drainage., P1149
[3]  
BARTH CA, 2000, PRACTICE WATERSHED P, P29
[4]  
Coffman L., 1993, Water Management in the 90's: A Time for Innovation, P126, DOI [DOI 10.14796/JWMM.R176-02, 10.14796/jwmm.r176-02]
[5]  
COFFMAN L, 1993, WATER MANAGEMENT 90S, P130
[6]   Water quality improvement through bioretention: Lead, copper, and zinc removal [J].
Davis, AP ;
Shokouhian, M ;
Sharma, H ;
Minami, C ;
Winogradoff, D .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2003, 75 (01) :73-82
[7]   Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management [J].
Davis, AP ;
Shokouhian, M ;
Sharma, H ;
Minami, C .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2001, 73 (01) :5-14
[8]   A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment [J].
Dietz, ME ;
Clausen, JC .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2005, 167 (1-4) :123-138
[9]  
DUNN J, 1977, SOIL SURVEY ORANGE C
[10]  
EMERSON C, 2004, P 2004 WORLD WAT ENV, P403