Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: A randomized clinical trial

被引:190
作者
Rahusen, FD
Bremers, AJA
Fabry, HFJ
van Amerongen, AHMT
Boom, RPA
Meijer, S
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Med Ctr Leeuwarden, Dept Surg, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
[4] Dist Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Amstelveen, Netherlands
关键词
nonpalpable; mammography; ultrasonography; breast neoplasms; segmental mastectomy; needle biopsy;
D O I
10.1245/ASO.2002.04.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background: The wire-guided excision of nonpalpable breast cancer often results in tumor resections with inadequate margins. This prospective, randomized trial was undertaken to investigate whether intraoperative ultrasound (US) guidance enables a better margin clearance than the wire-guided technique in the breast-con serving treatment of nonpalpable breast cancers. Methods: Patients with a preoperative histological diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer that could be visualized both with US and mammography were included. Patients were randomized to undergo either a wire-guided or a US-guided excision. Adequate margins were defined as ! I mm. Results: Of 49 included patients, 23 were assigned to undergo wire-guided excision and 26 to undergo US-guided excision. One patient crossed over to US-guided excision after inadvertent wire displacement. Mean tumor diameter, specimen weight, and operating time were similar in both groups. The excision was adequate in 24 (89%) of 27 US-guided excisions and 12 (55%) of 22 wire-guide excisions (P = .007). Conclusions: US-guided excision seems to be superior to wire-guided excision with respect to margin clearance of mammographically detected and US-visible nonpalpable breast cancers. Patients do not have to undergo the unpleasant wire placement before surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 998
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
INDOCYANINE GREEN-DYE AS A TISSUE MARKER FOR LOCALIZATION OF NONPALPABLE BREAST-LESIONS [J].
BERRIDGE, DL ;
MASTEY, LA ;
ECKSTROM, PC ;
CZARNECKI, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (05) :1299-1299
[2]
Cady B, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P301
[3]
CIATTO S, 1994, NEOPLASMA, V41, P341
[4]
Davies A H, 1994, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V39, P353
[5]
di Giorgio A, 1998, EUR J SURG, V164, P819
[6]
Factors affecting outcome of patients with impalpable breast cancer detected by breast screening [J].
Dixon, JM ;
Ravisekar, O ;
Cunningham, M ;
Anderson, EDC ;
Anderson, TJ ;
Brown, HK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (07) :997-1001
[7]
LOCALIZATION OF IMPALPABLE BREAST MASSES - VALUE OF SONOGRAPHY IN THE OPERATING-ROOM AND SCANNING OF EXCISED SPECIMENS [J].
FORNAGE, BD ;
ROSS, MI ;
SINGLETARY, SE ;
PAULUS, DD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (03) :569-573
[8]
Gage I, 1996, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V78, P1921, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<1921::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO
[9]
2-#
[10]
Intraoperative ultrasound localization to guide surgical excision of nonpalpable breast carcinoma [J].
Harlow, SP ;
Krag, DN ;
Ames, SE ;
Weaver, DL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 189 (03) :241-246