Implicit self-theories of shyness

被引:85
作者
Beer, JS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037//0022-3514.83.4.1009
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Three studies examined implicit self-theories in relation to shy people's goals, responses, and consequences within social situations. Shy incremental theorists were more likely than shy entity theorists to view social situations as a learning opportunity and to approach social settings (Study 1). Shy incremental theorists were less likely to use strategies aimed at avoiding social interaction (Studies 2 and 3) and suffered fewer negative consequences of their shyness (Study 3). These findings generalized across both hypothetical and actual social situations as well as both self-reports and observer reports and could not be attributed to individual differences in level of shyness. Together, these studies indicate that implicit self-theories of shyness are important for understanding individual differences among shy people and suggest new avenues for implicit self-theories research.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1024
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, SHYNESS DEV CONSOLID
[3]  
Arkin R.M., 1986, Shyness: Perspectives on research and treatment, P189
[4]  
Buss A.H., 1980, SELF CONSCIOUSNESS S
[5]  
Buss A.H., 1986, SHYNESS PERSPECTIVES, P39, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-0525-3_4
[6]   Making judgments about ability: The role of implicit theories of ability in moderating inferences from temporal and social comparison information [J].
Butler, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (05) :965-978
[7]   BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION, BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION, AND AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO IMPENDING REWARD AND PUNISHMENT - THE BIS BAS SCALES [J].
CARVER, CS ;
WHITE, TL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (02) :319-333
[8]  
Cheek J. M., 1990, Handbook of social and evaluation anxiety, P47
[9]   SHYNESS AND SOCIABILITY [J].
CHEEK, JM ;
BUSS, AH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 41 (02) :330-339
[10]  
CHEEK JM, 1985, 93 ANN CONV AM PSYCH