In vitro sealing ability of two materials at five different implant-abutment surfaces

被引:52
作者
Duarte, Antonio R. C.
Rossetti, Paulo H. O.
Rossetti, Leylha M. N.
Torres, Sergio A.
Bonachela, Wellington C.
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Oral Rehabil Program, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Microbiol, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Bauru, SP, Brazil
关键词
bacteria; dental implants; dental leakage; microbiology; osseointegration; titanium;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2006.060101
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Background: The aim of the present study was to test the sealing ability of two materials at five different implant-abutment surfaces. Methods: In the first phase, 2 mu l brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth was deposited into the implant wells and glass culture tubes. A varnish or silicon sealant was applied at the cervical implant portion of experimental groups. The control group remained unexposed. The abutments were torque-tightened to 20 Ncm with a manual torque driver. Implants were immersed in 4 ml BHI broth at 37 degrees C for 2 hours to exclude contamination. In the second phase, 100 mu l Enterococcus faecalis American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strain 29212 was deposited into the glass culture tubes. After periods of 7, 14, 21, 35, 49, and 63 days, the sealing capacity was checked. Abutments were removed, and a sterile paper cone collected material inside implant bodies. This material was transferred to new tubes with BHI to verify the presence of cloudy broths within 24 to 48 hours. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two materials for each time period (Fisher exact test; P > 0.05). Group E showed the least level of sealing ability (six implants contaminated), whereas group T showed the highest level (only two implants). Conclusions: 1) Materials tested were not able to prevent contamination over 63 days. 2) Bacterial contamination was verified after 14 and 35 days in the control and experimental groups, respectively. 3) Although materials tested had demonstrated similar sealing capacities, dental implants showed bacterial contamination regardless of their external or internal hexagonal configurations.
引用
收藏
页码:1828 / 1832
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Bauman G R, 1992, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V7, P220
[2]
Besimo C, 1996, INT J PROSTHODONT, V9, P87
[3]
Besimo CE, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P654
[4]
Breeding L C, 1993, Int J Prosthodont, V6, P435
[5]
Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface [J].
Broggini, N ;
McManus, LM ;
Hermann, JS ;
Medina, RU ;
Oates, TW ;
Schenk, RK ;
Buser, D ;
Mellonig, JT ;
Cochran, DL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 (03) :232-237
[6]
DELORENZO JL, 1997, REV ABO, V5, P321
[7]
ERICSSON I, 1995, J CLIN PERIODONTOL, V22, P255
[8]
Microbiological and clinical effects of chlorhexidine enclosed in fixtures of 3I-Titamed® implants [J].
Groenendijk, E ;
Dominicus, JJK ;
Moorer, WR ;
Aartman, IHA ;
van Waas, MAJ .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (02) :174-179
[9]
Gross M, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P94
[10]
Guindy JS, 1998, J ORAL REHABIL, V25, P403