Consensus recommendations for use of central venous access devices in haemophilia

被引:84
作者
Ewenstein, BM
Valentino, LA
Journeycake, JM
Tarantino, MD
Shapiro, AD
Blanchette, VS
Hoots, WK
Buchanan, GR
Manco-Johnson, MJ
Rivard, GE
Miller, KL
Geraghty, S
Maahs, JA
Stuart, R
Dunham, T
Navickis, RJ
机构
[1] Baxter Biosci, Westlake Village, CA 91362 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Hemophilia & Thrombosis Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] RUSH Childrens Hosp, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Childrens Med Ctr, Hematol Oncol Clin, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
[5] Comprehens Bleeding Disorders Ctr, Peoria, IL USA
[6] Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Ctr, Indianapolis, IN USA
[7] Hosp Sick Children, Div Hematol Oncol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[8] Gulf State Hemophilia & Thrombophilia Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[9] Mt States Reg Hemophilia & Thrombosis Ctr, Aurora, CO USA
[10] Univ Montreal, Div Hematol & Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[11] Hyg Associates, Grass Valley, CA USA
关键词
catheterization; central venous; haemophilia A; haemophilia B; infection; practice guidelines; venous thrombosis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.00943.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Venous access is essential for delivery of haemophilia factor concentrate. Wherever possible, peripheral veins remain the route of choice, and the use of central venous access devices (CVADs) should be limited to cases of clear need in patients with caregivers able to exercise diligence in CVAD care and should continue no longer than necessary. CVADs are of recognized value for repeated administration of coagulation factors in haemophilia, particularly for prophylaxis and immune tolerance therapy and in young children. Evidence to guide best practices has been fragmentary, and standardized methods for CVAD usage have yet to be established. We have developed management recommendations based upon available published evidence as well as extensive clinical experience. These recommendations address patient and CVAD selection; CVAD placement, care and removal; caregiver/patient guidance; and complications, including infection and thrombosis. In the absence of inhibitors, ports are recommended, primarily because of fewer associated infections than with external catheters. For patients with inhibitors, ports also appear to be associated with fewer infections. Infection is the most frequent complication, and recommendations to prevent and treat infections are supported by extensive clinical data and experience. Strict adherence to handwashing and aseptic technique are essential elements of catheter care. Evidence-based data regarding the detection and treatment of CVAD-related thrombotic complications are limited. Caregiver education is an integral part of CVAD use and the procedural practices of users should be regularly re-assessed. These recommendations provide a basis for sound current CVAD practice and are expected to undergo further refinements as new evidence is compiled and clinical experience is gained.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 648
页数:20
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
AHMAD I, 2001, CENTRAL VENOUS ACCES, P151
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Haemophilia, V7, P313
[3]  
Baranowski L, 1993, J Intraven Nurs, V16, P167
[4]   Use of antibiotic locks to treat colonized central venous catheters [J].
Berrington, A ;
Gould, FK .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 48 (05) :597-603
[5]  
Blanchette VS, 1996, BLOOD COAGUL FIBRIN, V7, pS39
[6]  
Blanchette VS, 1997, BLOOD COAGUL FIBRIN, V8, pS11
[7]  
Blanchette VS, 1999, BLOOD, V94, p234A
[8]  
Bollard CM, 2000, HAEMOPHILIA, V6, P66
[9]  
Bravery K, 1997, Paediatr Nurs, V9, P29
[10]  
BUCHANAN GR, 2000, HAEMOPHILIA, V6, P271