Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prediction of an Involved Surgical Resection Margin in Low Rectal Cancer

被引:64
作者
Salerno, Gisella V. [2 ]
Daniels, Ian R. [2 ]
Moran, Brendan J. [2 ]
Heald, R. J. [2 ]
Thomas, Karen [3 ]
Brown, Gina [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sutton, Surrey, England
[2] N Hampshire Hosp, Pelican Canc Fdn, Basingstoke, Hants, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Med Comp & Stat, Sutton, Surrey, England
关键词
Rectal cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging stage; Abdominoperineal excision surgery; LOCAL RECURRENCE; ADENOCARCINOMA; EXCISION;
D O I
10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a0a37e
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Low rectal cancers (<5 cm from the anal verge), compared with all others, have greater positive resection margin rates, attributed to mesorectal tapering and higher perforation risk. The aim of this study was to assess positive resection margin prediction by using magnetic resonance imaging staging. METHODS: The following features were analyzed by using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging from 101 consecutive patients with low rectal tumors: tumor location (posterior/anterior) and magnetic resonance stage (Stage 1-2, tumor within the intersphincteric plane; Stage 3-4 tumor extending into the intersphincteric plane). Magnetic resonance imaging tumor regression grade was measured where posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging was available and compared with histopathologic findings. RESULTS: Seventy of 101 patients had abdominoperineal excisions, and 31 of 101 had low anterior resections. Using logistic regression, positive resection margin odds were higher for magnetic resonance Stages 3 to 4 than Stages 1 to 2 by a factor of 17.7 (P < 0.001), and positive resection margin odds were higher by a factor of 2.8 for anterior vs. posterior tumors (P = 0.026). Magnetic resonance imaging tumor regression grade strongly predicted for positive resection margins; 11 of 15 patients with little treatment response had positive resection margins, compared with 2 of 15 with >50 percent complete treatment response on magnetic resonance imaging (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Significant magnetic resonance imaging positive resection margin predictors are tumor into or beyond the intersphincteric plane and magnetic resonance imaging tumor regression grade.
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 639
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BOYLE KMC, 2004, EUR J CANC SURG, V30, P1020
[2]   Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study [J].
Brown, G. ;
Daniels, I. R. ;
Heald, R. J. ;
Quirke, P. ;
Blomqvist, L. ;
Sebag-Montefiore, D. ;
Moran, B. J. ;
Holm, T. ;
Strassbourg, J. ;
Peppercorn, P. D. ;
Fisher, S. E. ;
Mason, B. .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7572) :779-782
[3]  
Brown G, 2005, RECENT RES CANCER, V165, P58, DOI 10.1007/3-540-27449-9_8
[4]   Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Brown, G ;
Radcliffe, AG ;
Newcombe, RG ;
Dallimore, NS ;
Bourne, MW ;
Williams, GT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (03) :355-364
[5]   Local recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer is associated with anterior position of the tumour [J].
Chan, CLH ;
Bokey, EL ;
Chapuis, PH ;
Renwick, AA ;
Dent, OF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (01) :105-112
[6]  
Daniels IR, 2006, COLORECTAL DIS, V8, P25, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01067.x
[7]   Oncologic results following abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum [J].
Dehni, N ;
McFadden, N ;
McNamara, DA ;
Guiguet, M ;
Tiret, E ;
Parc, R .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (07) :867-874
[8]   THE EFFECT OF MALIGNANT AND INFLAMMATORY FIXATION OF RECTAL-CARCINOMA ON PROGNOSIS AFTER RECTAL EXCISION [J].
DURDEY, P ;
WILLIAMS, NS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1984, 71 (10) :787-790
[9]   Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway [J].
Eriksen, MT ;
Wibe, A ;
Syse, A ;
Haffner, J ;
Wiig, JN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (02) :210-216
[10]   Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Difference in outcome for low and high rectal cancer [J].
Faerden, AE ;
Naimy, N ;
Wiik, P ;
Reiertsen, O ;
Weyessa, S ;
Tronnes, S ;
Andersen, SN ;
Bakka, A .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (12) :2224-2231