Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and stroke motor recovery of arm/hand functions: a meta-analysis

被引:99
作者
Bolton, DAE [1 ]
Cauraugh, JH [1 ]
Hausenblas, HA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Motor Behav Lab, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
active neuromuscular stimulation; stroke motor recovery; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jns.2004.05.005
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Debate persists about the effectiveness of poststroke behavioral interventions for progress toward motor recovery. The current meta-analysis assessed the effect of electromyogram (EMG)-triggered neuromuscular stimulation on arm and hand functions. Computer searches of PubMed and Cochran databases, as well as hand searches of reference lists identified seven EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation studies. Outcome measures focused on arm and hand motor capability functions. In addition, the quality of each study was rated on three guidelines: randomization, double blind, and dropouts. After adjusting data for consistency in the arm/hand outcome measures and to avoid bias, five active stimulation studies were included in the analysis. Rehitbilitation treatment in each study focused on wrist extension. The total number of individuals in the treatment groups was 47 whereas the control groups had 39 subjects. The meta-analysis revealed a significant overall mean effect size (delta = 0.82, S.D. = 0.59). A homogeneity test indicated that the pooled standardized effect sizes estimated the same treatment effect. A fail-safe test for null effect findings revealed that 15 studies were required to reduce the large effect (0.82) to a small effect (0.20). These improved wrist extension motor capabilities findings support EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation as an effective poststroke protocol. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 127
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]
Abelson R.P., 1995, Statistics As Principled Argument, DOI 10.4324/9781410601155
[2]
BOWMAN BR, 1979, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V60, P497
[3]
Clinical and therapeutic applications of neuromuscular stimulation: A review of current use and speculation into future developments [J].
Burridge, JH ;
Ladouceur, M .
NEUROMODULATION, 2001, 4 (04) :147-153
[4]
Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke - Recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation [J].
Cauraugh, J ;
Light, K ;
Kim, S ;
Thigpen, M ;
Behrman, A .
STROKE, 2000, 31 (06) :1360-1364
[5]
Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation [J].
Cauraugh, JH ;
Kim, SB .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 215 (1-2) :13-19
[6]
Stroke motor recovery: active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules [J].
Cauraugh, JH ;
Kim, SB .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 74 (11) :1562-1566
[7]
Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one - Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements [J].
Cauraugh, JH ;
Kim, S .
STROKE, 2002, 33 (06) :1589-1594
[8]
Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia [J].
Chae, J ;
Bethoux, F ;
Bohinc, T ;
Dobos, L ;
Davis, T ;
Friedl, A .
STROKE, 1998, 29 (05) :975-979
[9]
Intramuscular electromyographically controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation for upper limb recovery in chronic hemiplegia [J].
Chae, J ;
Fang, ZP ;
Walker, M ;
Pourmehdi, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2001, 80 (12) :935-941
[10]
THINGS I HAVE LEARNED (SO FAR) [J].
COHEN, J .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1990, 45 (12) :1304-1312