The optimal motor response for infraclavicular brachial plexus block

被引:16
作者
Minville, Vincent [1 ]
Fourcade, Olivier
Bourdet, Benoit
Doherty, Mary
Chassery, Clement
Pourrut, Jean-Claude
Gris, Claude
Eychennes, Bernard
Colombani, Aline
Samii, Kamran
Bouaziz, Herve
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Toulouse, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Toulouse, France
[2] Nancy Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Nancy, France
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000253235.39696.fa
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: In this prospective study we compared the success of the infraclavicular brachial plexus block using double-stimulation in regard to the second nerve response elicited with neurostimulation. METHODS: Six-hundred-twenty-eight patients undergoing emergency upper limb surgery using infraclavicular brachial plexus block were included in this study. The musculocutaneous nerve was initially blocked and the groups were then evaluated according to the second nerve located, which was radial in 54%, median in 35%, and ulnar in 11% of patients. Blocks were performed using lidocaine 1.5% with 1/400,000 epinephrine 40 mL in all cases. The block was assessed every 5 min for 30 min after completion of the block. RESULTS: The success rate was 96% for the radial response group, 89% for the median response group, and 90% for the ulnar response group (P < 0.05). Time to perform the block and the onset time were not significantly different among groups. No serious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: We conclude that having initially located and blocked the musculocutaneous nerve, subsequent injection on a radial response resulted in a slightly more reliable success rate than injection with an ulnar or median response.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 451
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
Efficiency of secondary posterior trunk single stimulation, low volume infraclavicular plexus block for upper limb surgery [J].
Bloc, S ;
Garnier, T ;
Komly, B ;
Leclerc, P ;
Mercadal, L ;
Morel, B ;
Dhonneur, G .
ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2005, 24 (11-12) :1329-1333
[2]
Desroches T, 2003, CAN J ANAESTH, V50, P253, DOI 10.1007/BF03017794
[3]
Infraclavicular plexus block: Multiple injection versus single injection [J].
Gaertner, E ;
Estebe, JP ;
Zamfir, A ;
Cuby, C ;
Macaire, P .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (06) :590-594
[4]
Infraclavicular block causes less discomfort than axillary block in ambulatory patients [J].
Koscielniak-Nielsen, ZJ ;
Rasmussen, H ;
Hesselbjerg, L ;
Nielsen, TP ;
Gürkan, Y .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 49 (07) :1030-1034
[5]
Stimulation of the posterior cord predicts successful infraclavicular block [J].
Lecamwasam, H ;
Mayfield, J ;
Rosow, L ;
Chang, YC ;
Carter, C ;
Rosow, C .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (05) :1564-1568
[6]
Infraclavicular brachial plexus block versus humeral block in trauma patients: A comparison of patient comfort [J].
Minville, V ;
Fourcade, O ;
Idabouk, L ;
Claassen, J ;
Chassery, C ;
Nguyen, L ;
Pourrut, JC ;
Benhamou, D .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (03) :912-915
[7]
A modified coracoid approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks using a double-stimulation technique in 300 patients [J].
Minville, V ;
N'Guyen, L ;
Chassery, C ;
Zetlaoui, P ;
Pourrut, JC ;
Gris, C ;
Eychennes, B ;
Benhamou, D ;
Samii, K .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 100 (01) :263-265
[8]
Porter JM, 2005, CAN J ANAESTH, V52, P69, DOI 10.1007/BF03018583
[9]
A comparison of single versus multiple injections on the extent of anesthesia with coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block [J].
Rodríguez, J ;
Bárcena, M ;
Taboada-Muñiz, M ;
Lagunilla, J ;
Alvarez, J .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (04) :1225-1230
[10]
Wilson JL, 1998, ANESTH ANALG, V87, P870