Molecular markers of response and toxicity to FOLFOX chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: To investigate three genetic alterations (TP53 mutation, Kras mutation and microsatellite instability (MSI)) and three polymorphisms (methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T, excision repair cross complementing group 1 (ERCC1)-118 and X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1)-399) for their ability to predict response, survival and toxicity to FOLFOX first line chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Tumour tissues from 118 mCRC patients who underwent FOLFOX treatment from three successive phase II trials were evaluated for mutations in TP53 (exons 5-8) and Kras (codons 12 and 13) and for MSI using PCR-based analysis. Genotyping for common single nucleotide polymorphisms in the MTHFR (codon 677), ERCC1 (codon 118) and XRCC1 (codon 399) genes was also carried out using PCR techniques. These genetic markers were correlated with clinical response, survival and toxicity to treatment. RESULTS: Patients with the T allele of ERCC1-118 showed significantly worse progression-free survival in univariate analysis (HR = 2.62; 95% CI = 1.14-6.02; P = 0.02). None of the genetic alterations or polymorphisms showed significant association with clinical response to FOLFOX. The MTHFR, ERCC1 and XRCC1 polymorphisms showed no associations with overall haematological, gastrointestinal or neurological toxicity to FOLFOX, although MTHFR 677 TT genotype patients showed a significantly higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea (26%) compared with CC or CT genotype patients (6%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The ERCC1-118 and MTHFR C677T polymorphisms were associated with progression and severe diarrhoea, respectively, after FOLFOX treatment in mCRC. Although our findings require confirmation in large prospective studies, they reinforce the concept that individual genetic variation may allow personalized selection of chemotherapy to optimize clinical outcomes. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, 998-1004. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605239 www.bjcancer.com Published online 11 August 2009 (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK