Methodological considerations of measuring disability in bipolar disorder: validity of the Multidimensional Scale of Independent Functioning

被引:29
作者
Berns, Stefanie
Uzelac, Sarah
Gonzalez, Cristina
Jaeger, Judith
机构
[1] Zucker Hillside Hosp, Ctr Neuropsychiat Outcome & Rehabil Res, Glen Oaks, NY 11004 USA
[2] Mt St Mary Coll, Div Social Sci, Newburgh, NY USA
[3] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Psychiat, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
bipolar disorder; disability; outcome; rating scale;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00305.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Recent studies have highlighted the prevalence, severity and persistence of the disability associated with bipolar disorder (BPD). Reliable instruments are needed to support research into the factors associated with disability and treatment response. Contextual factors (e.g., availability of supported employment programs) can affect functionality, posing a challenge to such investigations. We present preliminary findings regarding the validity of the Multidimensional Scale of Independent Functioning (MSIF) in BPD. The MSIF provides discrete ratings of support separate from both role responsibility and performance quality in work, residential and educational environments. These distinctions allow the 'correction' for variability explained by contextual factors that allows the comparison of studies conducted in different environments and time. Methods: Participants with BPD were administered the MSIF, the Social Adjustment Scale II (SAS-II) and an interview recording objective data regarding work, school and residential activities as part of an ongoing longitudinal study of BPD disability. Results: Construct validity estimated using standardized Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.76 (n = 58). MSIF global ratings were significantly lower (reflecting higher functionality) for subjects engaged in productive activity compared with participants who were not active (t = -3.6, p = 0.001) demonstrating external validity. Inter-rater reliability estimates ranged from 0.86 to 0.99 (n = 49). Significant, high correlations were demonstrated between comparable MSIF and SAS-II global ratings (criterion validity = 0.70-0.79) and low correlations were found between non-comparable ratings (discriminant validity = -0.07 to -0.35) (n = 14). Conclusion: We conclude that the MSIF is a valid and reliable instrument optimally designed for studying determinants of disability and treatment response in BPD.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 10
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   THE CLINICIAN-ADMINISTERED RATING-SCALE FOR MANIA (CARS-M) - DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND VALIDITY [J].
ALTMAN, EG ;
HEDEKER, DR ;
JANICAK, PG ;
PETERSON, JL ;
DAVIS, JM .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 36 (02) :124-134
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Handbook of psychiatric rehabilitation
[3]   Determinants of functional outcome and healthcare costs in bipolar disorder: a high-intensity follow-up study [J].
Bauer, MS ;
Kirk, GF ;
Gavin, C ;
Williford, WO .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2001, 65 (03) :231-241
[4]   SOCIAL COMPETENCE IN SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER, BIPOLAR DISORDER, AND NEGATIVE AND NON-NEGATIVE SCHIZOPHRENIA [J].
BELLACK, AS ;
MORRISON, RL ;
MUESER, KT ;
WADE, J .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1989, 2 (4-5) :391-401
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF PREMORBID ADJUSTMENT IN CHRONIC-SCHIZOPHRENIA [J].
CANNONSPOOR, HE ;
POTKIN, SG ;
WYATT, RJ .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 1982, 8 (03) :470-484
[6]  
Cook J.A., 1993, Psychosoc Rehabil J, V17, P83, DOI [DOI 10.1037/H0095623, 10.1037/h0095623]
[7]   Bipolar I affective disorder: predictors of outcome after 15 years [J].
Coryell, W ;
Turvey, C ;
Endicott, J ;
Leon, AC ;
Mueller, T ;
Solomon, D ;
Keller, M .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1998, 50 (2-3) :109-116
[8]  
CORYELL W, 1993, AM J PSYCHIAT, V150, P720
[9]  
DION GL, 1988, HOSP COMMUNITY PSYCH, V39, P652
[10]   REHABILITATIVE DAY TREATMENT VS SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT .1. VOCATIONAL OUTCOMES [J].
DRAKE, RE ;
BECKER, DR ;
BIESANZ, JC ;
TORREY, WC ;
MCHUGO, GJ ;
WYZIK, PF .
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 1994, 30 (05) :519-532