Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA

被引:22
作者
Grandin, Nathalie [1 ]
Charbonneau, Michel [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Normale Super Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5161, IFR128 Biosci Gerland, F-69364 Lyon, France
关键词
D O I
10.1093/nar/gkl1081
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomerase-negative cells undergo homologous recombination on subtelomeric or TG(1-3) telomeric sequences, thus allowing Type I or Type II post-senescence survival, respectively. Here, we find that the DNA damage sensors, Mec1, Mec3 and Rad24 control Type II recombination, while the Rad9 adaptor protein and the Rad53 and Chk1 effector kinases have no effect on survivor type selection. Therefore, the Mec1 and Mec3 checkpoint complexes control telomeric recombination independently of their roles in generating and amplifying the Mec1-Rad53-Chk1 kinase cascade. rfa1-t11 mutant cells, bearing a mutation in Replication Protein A (RPA) conferring a defect in recruiting Mec1-Ddc2, were also deficient in both types of telomeric recombination. Importantly, expression of an Rfa1-t11-Ddc2 hybrid fusion protein restored checkpoint-dependent arrest, but did not rescue defective telomeric recombination. Therefore, the Rfa1-t11-associated defect in telomeric recombination is not solely due to its failure to recruit Mec1. We have also isolated novel alleles of RFA1 that were deficient in Type I but not in Type II recombination and proficient in checkpoint control. Therefore, the checkpoint and recombination functions of RPA can be genetically separated, as can the RPA-mediated control of the two types of telomeric recombination.
引用
收藏
页码:822 / 838
页数:17
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] The checkpoint protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in processing double-strand break ends and in recombination partner choice
    Aylon, Y
    Kupiec, M
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 23 (18) : 6585 - 6596
  • [2] EXO1 contributes to telomere maintenance in both telomerase-proficient and telomerase-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae
    Bertuch, AA
    Lundblad, V
    [J]. GENETICS, 2004, 166 (04) : 1651 - 1659
  • [3] Human DNA damage checkpoint protein hRAD9 is a 3′ to 5′ exonuclease
    Bessho, T
    Sancar, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 275 (11) : 7451 - 7454
  • [4] Telomere dynamics in genome stability
    Bhattacharyya, MK
    Lustig, AJ
    [J]. TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2006, 31 (02) : 114 - 122
  • [5] Replication Protein A phosphorylation and the cellular response to DNA damage
    Binz, SK
    Sheehan, AM
    Wold, MS
    [J]. DNA REPAIR, 2004, 3 (8-9) : 1015 - 1024
  • [6] Switching and signaling at the telomere
    Blackburn, EH
    [J]. CELL, 2001, 106 (06) : 661 - 673
  • [7] From RPA to BRCA2: lessons from single-stranded DNA binding by the OB-fold
    Bochkarev, A
    Bochkareva, E
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) : 36 - 42
  • [8] Beginning at the end
    Carr, AM
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5625) : 1512 - 1513
  • [9] Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity links Crb2 and Rqh1-topoisomerase III
    Caspari, T
    Murray, JM
    Carr, AM
    [J]. GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 16 (10) : 1195 - 1208
  • [10] Telomere maintenance and DNA replication: how closely are these two connected?
    Chakhparonian, M
    Wellinger, RJ
    [J]. TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2003, 19 (08) : 439 - 446