The effect of spatial resolution on the ability on to monitor the status of agricultural lands

被引:51
作者
PaxLenney, M
Woodcock, CE
机构
[1] BOSTON UNIV,CTR REMOTE SENSING,BOSTON,MA 02215
[2] BOSTON UNIV,DEPT GEOG,BOSTON,MA 02215
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00003-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Monitoring regional and global changes in agricultural land use requires coarse spatial resolution imagery in order to keep data volumes reasonable and to allow sufficiently frequent temporal coverage. The viability of coarse spatial resolution data for monitoring the status of agricultural lands is evaluated using degraded multitemporal TM imagery. Areal estimates of productive land in Egypt's Western Desert are slightly underestimated at spatial resolutions of 120 m ad 240 m. Although error increases at 480 m and 960 m, estimates are within 10% of the original 30-m estimations. The area of old agricultural lands is more accurately estimated while reclaimed lands (cultivated after June 1985) show greater underestimation errors. These results suggest that the areal extent of these lands can be estimated accurately using multitemporal data with intermediary spatial resolutions such as the 250 m Bands 1 and 2 of the upcoming MODIS instrument. While overall map accuracies are good, the location of the reclaimed lands are poorly mapped. Fine spatial resolution data will still be needed to map the location of the fields. Also, the multitemporal maximum NDVI threshold differentiating productive and non-productive lands, identified in the original TM data, is relatively stable across the four coarse resolutions tested. (C) Elsevier Science Inc., 1997.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 220
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Atkinson P.M., Curran P.J., Defining an optimal size of support for remote sensing investigations, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 33, 3, pp. 768-776, (1995)
[2]  
Badhwar G.D., Carnes J.G., Austin W.W., Use of Landsat-derived temporal profiles for corn-soyabean feature extraction and classification, Remote Sens. Environ., 12, pp. 57-79, (1982)
[3]  
Barker J.L., Markham B.L., Burelbach J., Procedure for Spatial Simulation of MODIS Data from TM Imagery. Version: 0.11, (1992)
[4]  
Belward A.S., Lambin E., Limitations to the identification of spatial structures from AVHRR data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 11, 5, pp. 921-927, (1990)
[5]  
Congalton R.C., Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multitemporal analysis statistical techniques, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 49, 12, pp. 1671-1678, (1983)
[6]  
Cushnie J.L., The interactive effect of spatial resolution and degree of internal variability within land-cover types on classification accuracies, Int. J. Remote Sens., 8, 1, pp. 15-29, (1987)
[7]  
Friedl M.A., Examining the effects of sensor resolution and sub-pixel heterogeneity on spectral vegetation indices: Implications for biophysical modeling, Scaling of Remote Sensing Data for GIS, pp. 113-139, (1996)
[8]  
Friedl M.A., Davis F.W., Michaelson J., Moritz M.A., Scaling and uncertainty in the relationship between NDVI and land surface biophysical variables: An analysis using a scene simulation model and data from FIFE, Remote Sens. Environ., 54, pp. 233-246, (1995)
[9]  
Hall F.G., Huemmrich K.F., Goetz S.J., Sellers P.J., Nickeson J.E., Satellite remote sensing of surface energy balance: Success, failures, and unresolved issues in FIFE, J. Geophys. Res., 97, D17, pp. 19061-19089, (1992)
[10]  
Henderson-Sellers A., Pitman A.J., Land-surface schemes for future climate models: Specification, aggregation and heterogeneity, J. Geophys. Res., 97, D3, pp. 2687-2696, (1992)