Psychosocial Functioning in the Context of Diagnosis: Assessment and Theoretical Issues

被引:95
作者
Ro, Eunyoe [1 ]
Clark, Lee Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Psychol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
psychosocial functioning; psychopathology; diagnosis; assessment; DSM-V; GLOBAL ASSESSMENT; SELF-REPORT; PERSONALITY; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; DISORDER;
D O I
10.1037/a0016611
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Psychosocial functioning is an important focus of attention in the revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Researchers and clinicians are converging upon the opinion that psychometrically strong, comprehensive assessment of individuals' functioning is needed to characterize disorder fully. Also shared is the realization that existing theory and research in this domain have critical shortcomings. The authors urge that the field reexamine the empirical evidence and address theoretical issues to guide future development of the construct and its measurement. The authors first discuss several theoretical issues relevant to the conceptualization and assessment of functioning: (a) definitions of functioning, (b) the role of functioning in defining disorder, and (c) understanding functioning within environmental contexts. The authors then present data regarding empirical domains of psychosocial functioning and their interrelations. Self-reported data on multiple domains of psychosocial functioning were collected from 429 participants. Factor-analytic results (promax rotation) suggest a 4-factor structure of psychosocial functioning: Well-Being, Basic Functioning, Self-Mastery, and Interpersonal and Social Relationships. Finally, the authors propose an integration of theory and empirical findings, which they believe will better incorporate psychosocial functioning into future diagnostic systems.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 324
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Allport G. W., 1937, PERSONALITY PSYCHOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL FUNCTIONING P
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, DSM 3
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Short Version
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[6]  
Bacon S.F., 2002, J MENTAL HEALTH COUN, V24, P202
[7]   Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument [J].
Bonomi, AE ;
Patrick, DL ;
Bushnell, DM ;
Martin, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (01) :1-12
[8]   Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development [J].
Clark, LA ;
Watson, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :309-319
[9]   THE SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE [J].
DIENER, E ;
EMMONS, RA ;
LARSEN, RJ ;
GRIFFIN, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1985, 49 (01) :71-75
[10]   Impact of obsessive-compulsive disorder on quality of life [J].
Eisen, Jane L. ;
Mancebo, Maria A. ;
Pinto, Anthony ;
Coles, Meredith E. ;
Pagano, Maria E. ;
Stout, Robert ;
Rasmussen, Steven A. .
COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 47 (04) :272-277