New framework for standardized notation in wastewater treatment modelling

被引:63
作者
Corominas, Li. [1 ]
Rieger, L. [1 ]
Takacs, I. [2 ]
Ekama, G. [3 ]
Hauduc, H. [1 ,4 ]
Vanrolleghem, P. A. [1 ]
Oehmen, A. [5 ]
Gernaey, K. V. [6 ]
van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. [7 ]
Comeau, Y. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, ModelEAU, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[2] EnviroSim Associates Ltd, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[3] Univ Cape Town, Dept Civil Engn, Water Res Grp, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Irstea, UR HBAN, F-92163 Antony, France
[5] Univ Nova Lisboa, FCT, Dept Chem, CQFB REQUIMTE, P-2829516 Caparica, Portugal
[6] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Chem & Biochem Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[7] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Biotechnol, NL-2628 BC Delft, Netherlands
[8] Ecole Polytech, Dept Civil Geol & Min Engn, Montreal, PQ H3C 3A7, Canada
关键词
ADM; ASM; modeling; nomenclature; wastewater treatment; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE SYSTEMS; METABOLIC MODEL; GENERAL-MODEL; DEGRADATION;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2010.912
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many unit process models are available in the field of wastewater treatment. All of these models use their own notation, causing problems for documentation, implementation and connection of different models (using different sets of state variables). The main goal of this paper is to propose a new notational framework which allows unique and systematic naming of state variables and parameters of biokinetic models in the wastewater treatment field. The symbols are based on one main letter that gives a general description of the state variable or parameter and several subscript levels that provide greater specification. Only those levels that make the name unique within the model context are needed in creating the symbol. The paper describes specific problems encountered with the currently used notation, presents the proposed framework and provides additional practical examples. The overall result is a framework that can be used in whole plant modelling, which consists of different fields such as activated sludge, anaerobic digestion, sidestream treatment, membrane bioreactors, metabolic approaches, fate of micropollutants and biofilm processes. The main objective of this consensus building paper is to establish a consistent set of rules that can be applied to existing and most importantly, future models. Applying the proposed notation should make it easier for everyone active in the wastewater treatment field to read, write and review documents describing modelling projects.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 857
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1982, WATER RES, V16, P1501
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, WATER INTELL ONLINE, DOI DOI 10.2166/9781780403052
  • [3] General model for biological nutrient removal activated-sludge systems: model presentation
    Barker, PS
    Dold, PL
    [J]. WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1997, 69 (05) : 969 - 984
  • [4] Damhus T., 2005, NOMENCLATURE INORGAN
  • [5] DOLD PL, 1980, PROG WATER TECHNOL, V12, P47
  • [6] EKAMA G, 1977, WATER SA, V3, P7
  • [7] *ESA, 2007, GEN ACT SLUDG DIG MO
  • [8] Efficient modelling necessitates standards for model documentation and exchange
    Gernaey, KV
    Rosen, C
    Batstone, DJ
    Alex, J
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 53 (01) : 277 - 285
  • [9] *GMP TG, 2008, WEBS IWA TASK GROUP
  • [10] A comparative analysis of different approaches for integrated WWTP modelling
    Grau, P.
    Copp, J.
    Vanrolleghem, P. A.
    Takacs, I.
    Ayesa, E.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 59 (01) : 141 - 147