Prospect theory: Much ado about nothing?

被引:125
作者
Levy, M [1 ]
Levy, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
prospect theory; prospect stochastic dominance; Markowitz stochastic dominance;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.48.10.1334.276
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Prospet theory is a paradigm challenging the expected utility paradigm. One of the fundamental components of prospect theory is the S-shaped value function. The value function is mainly justified by experimental investigation of the certainty equivalents of prospects confined either to the negative or to the positive domain, but not of mixed prospects, which characterize most actual investments. We conduct an experimental study with mixed prospects, using, for the first time, recently developed investment criteria called Prospect Stochastic Dominance (PSD) and Markowitz Stochastic Dominance (MSD). We reject the S-shaped value function, showing that at least 62%-76% of the subjects cannot be characterized by such preferences. We find support for the Markowitz utility function, which is a reversed S-shaped function-exactly the opposite of the prospect theory value function. It is possible that the previous results supporting the S-shaped value function are distorted because the prospects had only positive or only negative outcomes, presenting hypothetical situations which individuals do not usually face, and which are certainly not common in financial markets.
引用
收藏
页码:1334 / 1349
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], REV EC STUDIES, DOI DOI 10.2307/2296205
[3]  
[Anonymous], J BUSINESS, DOI DOI 10.1086/296365
[4]   Prospect theory and asset prices [J].
Barberis, N ;
Huang, M ;
Santos, T .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :1-53
[5]   Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments [J].
Benartzi, S ;
Thaler, RH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (03) :364-381
[6]   MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE [J].
BENARTZI, S ;
THALER, RH .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) :73-92
[7]  
EDWARDS KD, 1996, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V5, P18
[8]   NONTRANSITIVE MEASURABLE UTILITY [J].
FISHBURN, PC .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 26 (01) :31-67
[9]   THE UTILITY ANALYSIS OF CHOICES INVOLVING RISK [J].
Friedman, Milton ;
Savage, L. J. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1948, 56 (04) :279-304
[10]  
HADAR J, 1969, AM ECON REV, V59, P25