Absence of glucose decreases human fertilization and sperm movement characteristics in vitro

被引:57
作者
Mahadevan, MM [1 ]
Miller, MM [1 ]
Moutos, DM [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ARKANSAS MED SCI HOSP,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,LITTLE ROCK,AR 72204
关键词
culture medium; fertilization; glucose; movement characteristics; spermatozoa;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/12.1.119
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The effect of glucose in a modified Ham's F10 medium (MM) without hypoxanthine, phosphate and transition metals on human fertilization and sperm survival in vitro was determined. Mature human oocytes from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients or Percoll-washed human spermatozoa were randomly allocated to one of the treatment groups: normal Ham's F10 MM, MM with 5 mM glucose (HGMM) and MM with 0.5 mM glucose (LGMM). Oocytes were inseminated in one of the four media for 12-20 h and checked for fertilization Sperm were incubated likewise for 4 and 24 h, and sperm motility and sperm movement characteristics including average path velocity (VAP), curvilinear velocity (VCL), straight line velocity (VSL), amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH), beat cross frequency (BCF), straightness (STR), and linearity (LIN) were determined using computer-assisted semen analysis. Fertilization rates were significantly lower in oocytes cultured in MM (23.8%) compared to LGMM (75.5%), HGMM (73.6%) or Ham's F10 (71.1%). Sperm characteristics after 4 h incubation in all four media were similar, except VAP, VSL, VCL and ALH were significantly lower in MM (no glucose) in comparison with the other three media. After 24 h VAP, VSL, VCL, ALH, LIN and percentage rapid spermatozoa were significantly higher in spermatozoa incubated in HGMM or Ham's F10 compared with MM or LGMM. Also after 24 h, the percentage of spermatozoa which were highly motile was greater in HGMM than in Ham's Fill. Absence of glucose significantly lowered fertilization rates and sperm movement characteristics in vitro.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 123
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ADEOYAOSIGUWA SA, 1993, J REPROD FERTIL, V99, P187, DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0990187
[2]  
Barnett DK, 1996, HUM REPROD, V11, P177
[3]   Culture of preimplantation embryos: Facts and artifacts [J].
Bavister, BD .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 1995, 1 (02) :91-148
[4]  
DEJONGE CJ, 1989, J ANDROL, V10, P232
[5]  
DROESCH K, 1989, FERTIL STERIL, V51, P292
[6]  
EDWARDS RG, 1981, NATURE, V293, pL253
[7]  
FRASER LR, 1981, J REPROD FERTIL, V61, P25, DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0610025
[8]   Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: Metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells [J].
Gardner, DK ;
Lane, M ;
Calderon, I ;
Leeton, J .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 65 (02) :349-353
[9]  
HALANGK W, 1985, BIOMED BIOCHIM ACTA, V44, P411