Implementation of a mandatory checklist of protocols and objectives improves compliance with a wide range of evidence-based intensive care unit practices

被引:94
作者
Byrnes, Matthew C. [1 ]
Schuerer, Douglas J. E. [1 ]
Schallom, Marilyn E. [3 ]
Sona, Carrie S. [3 ]
Mazuski, John E. [1 ]
Taylor, Beth E. [4 ]
McKenzie, Wendi [5 ]
Thomas, James M. [6 ]
Emerson, Jeffrey S. [3 ]
Nemeth, Jennifer L. [6 ]
Bailey, Ruth A. [6 ]
Boyle, Walter A. [2 ]
Buchman, Timothy G. [1 ]
Coopersmith, Craig M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Barnes Jewish Hosp, Dept Nursing, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Barnes Jewish Hosp, Dept Food & Nutr, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Barnes Jewish Hosp, Dept Pharm, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[6] Barnes Jewish Hosp, Perioperat Serv, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
error; safety; best practice; checklist; protocols; guidelines; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; ADVERSE EVENTS; SAFETY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a96379
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine a) if a checklist covering a diverse group of intensive care unit protocols and objectives would improve clinician consideration of these domains and b) if improved consideration would change practice patterns. Design: Pre- and postobservational study. Setting: A 24-bed surgical/burn/trauma intensive care unit in a teaching hospital. Patients: A total of 1399 patients admitted between June 2006 and May 2007. Interventions: The first component of the study evaluated whether mandating verbal review of a checklist covering 14 intensive care unit best practices altered verbal consideration of these domains. Evaluation was performed using real-time bedside audits on morning rounds. The second component evaluated whether the checklist altered implementation of these domains by changing practice patterns. Evaluation was performed by analyzing data from the Project IMPACT database after patients left the intensive care unit. Measurements and Main Results: Verbal consideration of evaluable domains improved from 90.9% (530/583) to 99.7% (669/671, p < .0001) after verbal review of the checklist was mandated. Bedside consideration improved on the use of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis (p < .05), stress ulcer prophylaxis (p < .01), oral care for ventilated patients (p < 0.01), electrolyte repletion (p < .01), initiation of physical therapy (p < .05), and documentation of restraint orders (p < .0001). Mandatory verbal review of the checklist resulted in a greater than two-fold increase in transferring patients out of the intensive care unit on telemetry (16% vs. 35%, p < .0001) and initiation of physical therapy (28% vs. 42%, p < .0001) compared with baseline practice. Conclusions: A mandatory verbal review of a checklist covering a wide range of objectives and goals at each patient's bedside is an effective method to improve both consideration and implementation of intensive care unit best practices. A bedside checklist is a simple, cost-effective method to prevent errors of omission in basic domains of intensive care unit management that might otherwise be forgotten in the setting of more urgent care requirements. (Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2775-2781)
引用
收藏
页码:2775 / 2781
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[2]  
Barie Philip S, 2007, Surg Infect (Larchmt), V8, P491, DOI 10.1089/sur.2007.9980
[3]   Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit [J].
Berenholtz, SM ;
Pronovost, PJ ;
Lipsett, PA ;
Hobson, D ;
Earsing, K ;
Farley, JE ;
Milanovich, S ;
Garrett-Mayer, E ;
Winters, BD ;
Rubin, HR ;
Dorman, T ;
Perl, TM .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (10) :2014-2020
[4]   Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis [J].
Brunkhorst, Frank M. ;
Engel, Christoph ;
Bloos, Frank ;
Meier-Hellmann, Andreas ;
Ragaller, Max ;
Weiler, Norbert ;
Moerer, Onnen ;
Gruendling, Matthias ;
Oppert, Michael ;
Grond, Stefan ;
Olthoff, Derk ;
Jaschinski, Ulrich ;
John, Stefan ;
Rossaint, Rolf ;
Welte, Tobias ;
Schaefer, Martin ;
Kern, Peter ;
Kuhnt, Evelyn ;
Kiehntopf, Michael ;
Hartog, Christiane ;
Natanson, Charles ;
Loeffler, Markus ;
Reinhart, Konrad .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (02) :125-139
[5]   Enhancing the use of clinical guidelines: A social norms perspective [J].
Buchman, TG ;
Patel, VL ;
Dushoff, J ;
Ehrlich, PR ;
Feldman, M ;
Feldman, M ;
Levin, B ;
Miller, DT ;
Rozin, P ;
Levin, SA ;
Fitzpatrick, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2006, 202 (05) :826-836
[6]   Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement [J].
Cabana, MD ;
Rand, CS ;
Powe, NR ;
Wu, AW ;
Wilson, MH ;
Abboud, PAC ;
Rubin, HR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15) :1458-1465
[7]   Improving patients' safety locally: changing clinician behaviour [J].
Cook, DJ ;
Montori, VM ;
McMullin, JP ;
Finfer, SR ;
Rocker, GM .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9416) :1224-1230
[8]   Measurable outcomes of quality improvement in the trauma intensive care unit: The impact of a daily quality rounding checklist [J].
DuBose, Joseph J. ;
Inaba, Kenji ;
Shifett, Anthony ;
Trankiem, Christine ;
Teixeira, Pedro G. R. ;
Salim, Ali ;
Rhee, Peter ;
Demetriades, Demetrios ;
Belzberg, Howard .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 64 (01) :22-27
[9]   A clinical decision support system for prevention of venous thromboembolism - Effect on physician behavior [J].
Durieux, P ;
Nizard, R ;
Ravaud, P ;
Mounier, N ;
Lepage, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (21) :2816-2821
[10]   Tyacheostomy protocol: Experience with development and potential utility [J].
Freeman, Bradley D. ;
Kennedy, Carie ;
Robertson, T. Elizabeth ;
Coopersmith, Craig M. ;
Schallom, Marilyn ;
Sona, Carrie ;
Cracchiolo, Lisa ;
Schuerer, Douglas J. E. ;
Boyle, Walter A. ;
Buchman, Timothy G. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (06) :1742-1748