Effect of an organic shock load on the stability of an anaerobic migrating blanket reactor

被引:25
作者
Angenent, LT
Abel, SJ
Sung, S
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Environm Sci Engn Program, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Black & Veatch Consulting Engineers, Kansas City, MO 64114 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Civil & Construct Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE | 2002年 / 128卷 / 12期
关键词
anaerobic processes; stability; wastewater treatment;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2002)128:12(1109)
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to examine the effect of an organic shock load on the performance and stability of a laboratoryscale anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR). To accomplish an organic shock load, nonacidified sucrose solution was almost doubled in concentration, while maintaining a constant hydraulic retention time. The volumetric loading rate (VLR) was increased from 27 to 50 9 chemical oxygen demand (COD) L-1 day(-1) for a period of six hydraulic retention times (42 h). This resulted in an increase in the standard methane production rate (liters of methane at standard temperature and pressure per liter reactor volume per day) from 7 to 12 LL-1 day(-1). The pH levels stayed favorable and biomass washout was limited during the shock load due to the damping effects of a compartmentalized configuration. During the shock load, the propionate production in the initial compartments of the AMBR remained at the same level as before the shock load, while the acetate production rose sharply. Because propionate is the most difficult volatile fatty acid to be removed, unstable conditions due to excessive propionate accumulation during the shock load were prevented. Meanwhile, the acetate concentration in the liquid phase and hydrogen content in the headspace of the final compartments remained low, which ensured propionate degradation. Due to these intrinsic characteristics of the AMBR, the soluble COD removal efficiency stayed above 87% under these stressed conditions. Moreover, the performance of the AMBR reached pre-shock-load levels immediately after the VLR was restored to 25 g COD L-1 day(-1).
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1120
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Alphenaar A., 1994, THESIS WAGENINGEN AG
[2]   Development of anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR), a novel anaerobic treatment system [J].
Angenent, LT ;
Sung, SW .
WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (07) :1739-1747
[3]  
ANGENENT LT, 2002, IN PRESS WATER ENV R
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, V19th
[5]  
Bachman A., 1982, P 1 INT C FIX FILM B, P1192
[6]   PERFORMANCE-CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ANAEROBIC BAFFLED REACTOR [J].
BACHMANN, A ;
BEARD, VL ;
MCCARTY, PL .
WATER RESEARCH, 1985, 19 (01) :99-106
[7]   The use of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: A review [J].
Barber, WP ;
Stuckey, DC .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (07) :1559-1578
[8]   Staging of anaerobic processes for reduction of chronically high concentrations of propionic acid [J].
Duran, M ;
Speece, RE .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1998, 70 (02) :241-248
[9]   ANAEROBIC TREATMENT APPLICATIONS AND FUNDAMENTALS - SUBSTRATE-SPECIFICITY DURING PHASE-SEPARATION [J].
FOX, P ;
POHLAND, FG .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1994, 66 (05) :716-724
[10]   PERFORMANCE OF THE ANAEROBIC BAFFLED REACTOR UNDER STEADY-STATE AND SHOCK LOADING CONDITIONS [J].
GROBICKI, A ;
STUCKEY, DC .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1991, 37 (04) :344-355