Clinical efficacy of combined lithoclast and lithovac stone removal during ureteroscopy

被引:55
作者
Delvecchio, FC [1 ]
Kuo, RL [1 ]
Preminger, GM [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol,Comprehens Kidney Stone Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
calculi; ureter; lithotripsy;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67444-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Pneumatic lithotripsy has proved to be an extremely safe, efficient and low cost intracorporeal fragmentation modality. Unfortunately proximal migration of fragments into inaccessible areas in the intrarenal collecting system is a potential limitation during ureteroscopic procedures. Moreover, the lack of an efficient mechanism of stone retrieval further limits the widespread application of this technique. The newly developed Lithovac dagger suction device was designed to be combined with pneumatic lithotripsy during ureteroscopic stone removal. We evaluated the effectiveness of this combination for overcoming these limitations. Materials and Methods: Between February and December 1998, 21 patients underwent pneumatic lithotripsy of ureteral calculi combined with use of the Lithovac suction probe. Stone area was 20 to 320 mm.(2) (mean 84). Of the stones 71% and 29% were in the distal, and proximal and/or mid meter, respectively. We used a 0.8 mm. pneumatic lithotripsy probe placed through a 4.8Fr Lithovac probe at a pulse frequency of 12 Hz. and pressure of 2 atmospheres. Results: Mean operative time was 42 minutes and the stone fragmentation rate was 100%. There were no complications in our series and no proximal migration of fragments. The overall stone-free rate was 95% at 3-month followup. Conclusions: Using the Lithovac suction device greatly facilitates pneumatic lithotripsy during ureteroscopic stone removal. This combination not only prevents fragment migration, but also aids in maintaining a clear endoscopic field of view, allowing efficient, safe and effective stone fragmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 42
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Complications employing the holmium:YAG laser [J].
Beaghler, M ;
Poon, M ;
Ruckle, H ;
Stewart, S ;
Weil, D .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1998, 12 (06) :533-535
[2]   INVESTIGATION OF THE TISSUE EFFECTS OF A NEW DEVICE FOR INTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY - THE SWISS LITHOCLAST [J].
DENSTEDT, JD ;
RAZVI, HA ;
ROWE, E ;
GRIGNON, DJ ;
EBERWEIN, PM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (02) :535-537
[3]   Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates [J].
Eden, CG ;
Mark, IR ;
Gupta, RR ;
Eastman, J ;
Shrotri, NC ;
Tiptaft, RC .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1998, 12 (04) :307-312
[4]   A new generation of semirigid fiberoptic ureteroscopes [J].
Ferraro, RF ;
Abraham, VE ;
Cohen, TD ;
Preminger, GM .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (01) :35-40
[5]   THE LITHOVAC - NEW SUCTION DEVICE FOR THE SWISS LITHOCLAST [J].
HAUPT, G ;
PANNEK, J ;
HERDE, T ;
SCHULZE, H ;
SENGE, T .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1995, 9 (05) :375-377
[6]   ELECTROHYDRAULIC VERSUS PNEUMATIC DISINTEGRATION IN THE TREATMENT OF URETERAL STONES - A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE TRIAL [J].
HOFBAUER, J ;
HOBARTH, K ;
MARBERGER, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (03) :623-625
[7]   Ureteroscopy with intravenous sedation for treatment of distal ureteral calculi: A safe and effective alternative to shock wave lithotripsy [J].
Hosking, DH ;
Bard, RJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (03) :899-901
[8]   Ureteroscopic lithoclast lithotripsy: A cost-effective option [J].
Kok, TP ;
Ming, TS ;
Consigliere, D .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1998, 12 (04) :341-344
[9]   Ureteroscopic stone removal in the distal ureter. Why change? [J].
Netto, NR ;
Claro, JD ;
Esteves, SC ;
Andrade, EFM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (06) :2081-2083
[10]   Two-year experience with ureteral stones: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy v ureteroscopic manipulation [J].
Park, H ;
Park, M ;
Park, T .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1998, 12 (06) :501-504