A comparison of aqueous suspensions of budesonide nasal spray (128 mu g and 256 mu g once daily) and fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 mu g once daily) in the treatment of adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis

被引:33
作者
Stern, MA
Dahl, R
Nielsen, LP
Pedersen, B
Schrewelius, C
机构
[1] Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association (MAARA), Leicester General Hospital, Leicester
[2] Lungemedicinsk Afdeling, Aarhus Kommunehospital
[3] Clinical Research and Development, Astra Draco AB, Lund
[4] Midlands Asthma and Allergy Research Association, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY | 1997年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.2500/105065897781446658
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
The efficacy of aqueous suspensions of budesonide nasal spray and fluticasone propionate nasal spray, in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, was compared in a large, placebo-controlled, two-center study. A 1-week baseline period was followed by a 4- to 6-week treatment period during which 635 adult patients, aged 18-72 years, were randomized to receive either placebo, budesonide 128 mu g, or 256 mu g once daily, or fluticasone propionate, 200 mu g once daily. Nasal and eye symptoms, overall treatment efficacy and safety assessments were made during the study period. Combined, as well as individual, nasal symptoms were significantly improved in all three active treatment groups compared with placebo therapy. Treatment with 256 mu g/day of budesonide was found to be significantly more effective in reducing the sneezing score compared with 200 mu g/day of fluticasone propionate. Analysis of symptom scores on days when the pollen count was greater than 10 grains/m(3) revealed 256 mu g/day of budesonide therapy to be significantly more effective in reducing combined symptom scores as well as the individual scores for sneezing and runny nose, compared with 200 mu g/day fluticasone propionate. The higher dose of budesonide (256 mu g/day) was also more effective than the lower dose (128 mu g/day) in reducing sneezing scores and statistical significance was almost reached for the reduction in combined symptom and runny nose scores. Substantial or total control of symptoms was achieved by 31.4%, 85.3%, 88.4%, and 81.9% of patients receiving placebo, 128 mu g/day of budesonide, 256 mu g/day of budesonide, and 200 mu g/day of fluticasone propionate, respectively. The incidence of adverse events was low in all treatment groups. In conclsion, both budesonide and fluticasone propionate treatments were effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, 256 mu g/day of budesonide tended to be more effective than 200 mu g/day of fluticasone propionate and 128 mu g/day of budesonide, especially when patients were exposed to a higher pollen load.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 330
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   A PARALLEL-GROUP COMPARISON OF BUDESONIDE AND BECLOMETHASONE DIPROPIONATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF PERENNIAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS IN ADULTS [J].
ALMOHAIMEID, H .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1993, 21 (02) :67-73
[2]  
Andersson Morgan, 1995, Rhinology (Utrecht), V33, P18
[3]  
BALLE V, 1991, SCHWEIZ MED WOCHENSC, V121, P1
[4]   INTRANASAL BUDESONIDE ONCE DAILY IN SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS [J].
BHATIA, M ;
CAMPBELL, LM ;
ROSS, JRM ;
TAYLOR, MD ;
PEERS, EM ;
RICHARDSON, PDI .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 1991, 12 (05) :287-295
[5]  
BRATTSAND R, 1993, ADV CLIN IMMUNOLOGY, P129
[6]   BUDESONIDE - AN UPDATED REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, AND THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY IN ASTHMA AND RHINITIS [J].
BROGDEN, RN ;
MCTAVISH, D .
DRUGS, 1992, 44 (03) :375-407
[7]   INTRANASAL FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE - A REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACODYNAMIC AND PHARMACOKINETIC PROPERTIES, AND THERAPEUTIC POTENTIAL IN ALLERGIC RHINITIS [J].
BRYSON, HM ;
FAULDS, D .
DRUGS, 1992, 43 (05) :760-775
[8]  
DAHL R, 1992, ALLERGY, V47, P347
[9]  
DOLOVICH J, 1994, ANN ALLERGY, V73, P147
[10]  
HIGGINS A, 1988, NER ALLERGY, V9, P385