Cervical cancer in Australia and the United Kingdom: comparison of screening policy and uptake, and cancer incidence and mortality

被引:83
作者
Canfell, Karen [1 ]
Sitas, Freddy
Beral, Valerie
机构
[1] NSW Canc Council, Canc Epidemiol Res Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Oxford, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Oxford, England
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00661.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare cervical screening policy, screening uptake, and changes in cervical cancer incidence and mortality between Australia and the United Kingdom. Design: Analysis of screening registry data and national cancer statistics. Setting: In Australia, organised cervical screening was initiated in 1991 for sexually active women aged 18-69 years, with a recommended 2-yearly interval. In the UK, organised screening began in 1988 for women aged 20-64 years, with a recommended 3-yearly interval in most regions. Results: Estimated lifetime screening participation rates in 2001 were similar in the two countries, at 88% in Australia and 90% in the UK. For women who were screened and had a negative result, the median time to the next screen was 27 months in Australia and 38 months in the UK. At 39 months, equivalent proportions (74%) had been re-screened in the two countries, and by 60 months the re-screened proportions were 81% in Australia and 94% in the UK. From 1991-1993 to 1998-2000, the incidence of cervical cancer in women aged 20-69 years fell by 33% in Australia and 33% in the UK, and mortality from cervical cancer fell by 36% in both countries. Conclusions: After the introduction of organised screening, similar reductions in cervical cancer incidence and mortality were achieved in Australia and the UK. Therefore, the 2-yearly screening policy in Australia and the predominantly 3-yearly screening policy in the UK appear to have been of broadly similar effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 486
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), V293, P659
[2]   Cervical carcinoma and reproductive factors:: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 16,563 women with cervical carcinoma and 33,542 women without cervical carcinoma from 25 epidemiological studies [J].
Appleby, P. ;
Beral, V. ;
de Gonzalez, A. Berrington ;
Colin, D. ;
Franceschi, S. ;
Green, J. ;
La Vecchia, C. ;
Peto, J. ;
Plummer, M. ;
Randi, G. ;
Sweetland, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 119 (05) :1108-1124
[3]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2002, NAT HLTH SURV SUMM R
[4]  
*AUSTR GOV DEP HLT, ANN REP 2003 04
[5]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2005, GRIM GEN REC INC MOR
[6]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2002, CANC SER AIHW, V27
[7]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2002, CANC SER AIHW, V16
[8]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2002, CANC SER AIHW, V33
[9]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2002, CANC SER AIHW, V31
[10]  
*AUSTR I HLTH WELF, 2002, CANC SER AIHW, V21