Arguing about ASEAN: what do we disagree about?

被引:11
作者
Acharya, Amitav [1 ]
机构
[1] American Univ, Washington, DC 20016 USA
关键词
INSTITUTIONS;
D O I
10.1080/09557570903138444
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This article argues that ASEAN has been, will remain, an essentially contested institution. No one has claimed, or could claim, that ASEAN is a flawless organization, but at the same time, the characterization of ASEAN as a dysfunctional entity or a talk shop is misplaced. The reality lies in taking the middle ground as the articles in this special issue show. Research and debate on ASEAN should be based on comparing its record with other regional associations in the developing world and using some agreed criteria about what success or failure means. And disagreements about ASEAN's role should be welcomed as part of a healthy debate.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 499
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Acharya A, 2009, POLIT ASIA, P1
[2]  
Acharya A., 2007, Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective, P244
[3]  
ACHARYA A, 2007, ASEAN 40 MIDLIFE REJ
[4]  
Acharya Amitav., 2009, WHOSE IDEAS MATTER A
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, SECURITY COMMUNITIES, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511598661.002
[6]   The political economy of Southeast Asia's techno-glocalism [J].
Felker, Greg .
CAMBRIDGE REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2009, 22 (03) :469-491
[7]  
Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2007, ASEAN SEL PAND
[8]   Institutionalizing ASEAN: celebrating Europe through network governance [J].
Jetschke, Anja .
CAMBRIDGE REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2009, 22 (03) :407-426
[9]  
*KOMP, 2007, KOM 1 BERB PAND SOAL
[10]  
MEARSHEIMER JJ, 1995, INT SECURITY, V19, P5