So, you think you know others' goals? A repertory grid study

被引：28

作者：

Niu, Nan

Easterbrook, Steve

机构：

[1] Univ. of Toronto, Dept. of Computer Science, Toronto, ON M5S 2E4

来源：

IEEE SOFTWARE | 2007年 / 24卷 / 02期

基金：

加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;

关键词：

D O I：

10.1109/MS.2007.52

中图分类号：

TP31 [计算机软件];

学科分类号：

081202 ; 0835 ;

摘要：

The authors' approach, based on the Repertory Grid Technique, detects when stakeholders have different interpretations of the terms they use to describe their problem domain. By comparing stakeholders' grids, the authors highlight the mismatches and then generate follow-up questions to resolve them. © 2007 IEEE.

引用

页码：53 / +

页数：10

共 9 条

[1]

Kelly G.A., The Psychology of Personal Constructs, (1955)

[2]

Fransella F., Bell R., Bannister D., A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique, (2004)

[3]

Shaw M.L.G., Gaines B.R., Comparing Conceptual Structures: Consensus, Conflict, Correspondence, and Contrast, Knowledge Acquisition, 1, 4, pp. 341-363, (1989)

[4]

Kaiya H., Et al., Improving the Detection of Requirements Discordances among Stakeholders, Requirements Eng. J., 10, 4, pp. 289-303, (2005)

[5]

Pisan Y., Extending Requirement Specifications Using Analogy, Proc. 22nd Int'l Conf. Software Eng. (ICSE 00), pp. 70-76, (2000)

[6]

Chung L., Et al., Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering, (2000)

[7]

Niu N., Easterbrook S., Managing Terminological Interference in Goal Models with Repertory Grid, Proc. 14th IEEE Int'l Requirements Eng. Conf. (RE 06), pp. 296-299, (2006)

[8]

Easterbrook S., Et al., Do Viewpoints Lead to Better Conceptual Models? An Exploratory Case Study, Proc. 13th IEEE Int'l Requirements Eng. Conf. (RE 05), pp. 199-208, (2005)

[9]

Feather M.S., Requirements Engineering - Getting Right From Wrong, Proc. 3rd European Software Eng. Conf. (ESEC 91), pp. 485-488, (1991)

← 1 →