Quantification for the importance degree of engineering characteristics with a multi-level hierarchical structure in QFD

被引:42
作者
Jia, Weiqiang [1 ]
Liu, Zhenyu [1 ]
Lin, Zhiyun [2 ]
Qiu, Chan [1 ]
Tan, Jianrong [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, State Key Lab CAD&CG, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, State Key Lab Ind Control Technol, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Choquet integral; fuzzy evidential reasoning; quality function deployment; fuzzy measure; multi-level hierarchical structure; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; PRIORITIZE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS; MULTIPLE PREFERENCE FORMATS; DECISION-MAKING APPROACH; CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS; IMPORTANCE WEIGHTS; FUZZY QFD; TECHNICAL ATTRIBUTES; SUPPLIER SELECTION; PRODUCT DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2015.1041574
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Quantification for the importance degree of engineering characteristics (ECs) is an essential problem in quality function deployment. In real-world scenario, it is sometimes difficult to directly evaluate the correlation degree between ECs and customer requirements (CRs) as ECs are too abstract. Thus, the target ECs have to be further decomposed into several more detailed basic ECs and organised by a multi-level hierarchical structure. The paper investigates the quantification problem for the importance degree of such target ECs and tackles two critical issues. The first issue is how to deal with the uncertainties including fuzziness and incompleteness involved during the evaluation process. A fuzzy evidential reasoning algorithm-based approach is proposed to tackle this issue and derive the correlation degree between each of the basic ECs and the whole CRs. The second issue is how to deal with the interactions among the basic ECs decomposed from the same target EC during the aggregation process. A lambda-fuzzy measure and fuzzy discrete Choquet integral-based approach is proposed to tackle this issue and aggregate these basic ECs. Final importance degree of the target ECs can then be obtained. At the end of this paper, a case study is presented to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the method we propose.
引用
收藏
页码:1627 / 1649
页数:23
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Akao Y., 1997, P INT S QFD LINK
[2]   Supplier evaluation and selection with QFD and FAHP in a pharmaceutical company [J].
Alinezad, Alireza ;
Seif, Azadeh ;
Esfandiari, Nima .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 68 (1-4) :355-364
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, MATH MODELS DECISION
[5]   AN AHP FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS IN QFD - AN INDUSTRIALIZED HOUSING APPLICATION [J].
ARMACOST, RL ;
COMPONATION, PJ ;
MULLENS, MA ;
SWART, WW .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1994, 26 (04) :72-79
[6]   A fuzzy QFD approach to determine supply chain management strategies in the dairy industry [J].
Ayag, Zeki ;
Samanlioglu, Funda ;
Buyukozkan, Gulcin .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2013, 24 (06) :1111-1122
[7]  
Bevilacqua M., 2006, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, V12, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2006.02.001
[8]   Integrating AHP with QFD for robot selection under requirement perspective [J].
Bhattacharya, A ;
Sarkar, B ;
Mukherjee, SK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (17) :3671-3685
[9]   Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach [J].
Büyüközkan, G ;
Ertay, T ;
Kahraman, C ;
Ruan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2004, 19 (05) :443-461
[10]   Fuzzy group decision-making to multiple preference formats in quality function deployment [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Feyzioglu, Orhan ;
Ruan, Da .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2007, 58 (05) :392-402