A comparison of the efficacy of cleaning and disinfection methods in eliminating Salmonella spp. from commercial egg laying houses

被引:52
作者
Carrique-Mas, Juan J. [1 ]
Marin, Clara [2 ]
Breslin, Mark [1 ]
McLaren, Ian [1 ]
Davies, Rob [1 ]
机构
[1] Vet Labs Agcy, Dept Food & Environm Safety, Addlestone KT15 3NB, Surrey, England
[2] Poligono La Esperanza, Ctr Tecnol Anim, Inst Valenciano Invest Agr, Segorbe 12400, Spain
关键词
ENTERITIDIS PHAGE TYPE-4; POULTRY UNITS; LAYER FLOCKS; PERSISTENCE; CONTAMINATION;
D O I
10.1080/03079450903193768
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Effective terminal cleaning and disinfection (C&D) is regarded as a necessary step for the elimination of Salmonella spp. from laying houses. A total of 60 commercial laying houses that had housed laying flocks infected with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis or Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium that were representative of all production systems (cage, barn, free-range) were intensively sampled immediately after C&D as well as in the follow-on flock. The procedures investigated were: (1) a compound disinfectant consisting of a mixture of formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and quarternary ammonium applied at the recommended concentration; (2) a 10% (vol/vol) dilution of the standard 37% commercial formalin, applied by a contractor; and (3) other disinfection procedures selected and applied by the farmer. The recovery of Salmonella in the cleaned and disinfected houses was variable, with samples from floor and dropping boards/belts (cage houses) and scratching areas (non-cage houses) being the most likely to remain contaminated. In cage houses, the use of the 10% formalin dilution led to a statistically greater reduction in the sample prevalence than using any of the other C&D methods. A negative post-C&D result predicted clearance of Salmonella in 52% of cases, although the isolation of Salmonella from the houses immediately after C&D was not a perfect predictor of carry-over of infection.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 424
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   The antibacterial effects for Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 4 of different chemical disinfectants and cleaning agents tested under different conditions [J].
Berchieri, A ;
Barrow, PA .
AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 1996, 25 (04) :663-673
[2]   Comparison of environmental sampling methods for detecting Salmonella in commercial laying flocks in the UK [J].
Carrique-Mas, J. J. ;
Breslin, M. ;
Sayers, A. R. ;
McLaren, I. ;
Arnold, M. ;
Davies, R. .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 47 (06) :514-519
[3]   Persistence and clearance of different Salmonella serovars in buildings housing laying hens [J].
Carrique-Mas, J. J. ;
Breslin, M. ;
Snow, L. ;
McLaren, I. ;
Sayers, A. R. ;
Davies, R. H. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2009, 137 (06) :837-846
[4]   Observations on Salmonella contamination of commercial laying farms before and after cleaning and disinfection [J].
Davies, R ;
Breslin, M .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2003, 152 (10) :283-287
[5]  
DAVIES RH, 1995, POULTRY SCI, V74, P638, DOI 10.3382/ps.0740638
[6]   Persistence of Salmonella enteritidis in poultry units and poultry food [J].
Davies, RH ;
Wray, C .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) :589-596
[7]  
De Jong B., 2006, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V11
[8]  
*DEP ENV FOOD RUR, 2009, DIS APPR US ENGL WAL
[9]   Foodborne general outbreaks of Salmonella Enteritidis phage type 4 infection, England and Wales, 1992-2002:: where are the risks? [J].
Gillespie, IA ;
O'Brien, SJ ;
Adak, GK ;
Ward, LR ;
Smith, HR .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2005, 133 (05) :795-801
[10]   Surface disinfection tests with Salmonella and a putative indicator bacterium, mimicking worst-case scenarios in poultry houses [J].
Gradel, KO ;
Sayers, AR ;
Davies, RH .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 83 (10) :1636-1643