Life-history evolution under a production constraint

被引:137
作者
Brown, James H. [1 ]
Sibly, Richard M.
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Univ Reading, Sch Biol Sci, Reading RG6 6AS, Berks, England
[3] Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA
关键词
allometry; life-history theory; metabolic ecology;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0608522103
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 [理学]; 0710 [生物学]; 09 [农学];
摘要
The recently formulated metabolic theory of ecology has profound implications for the evolution of life histories. Metabolic rate constrains the scaling of production with body mass, so that larger organisms have lower rates of production on a mass-specific basis than smaller ones. Here, we explore the implications of this constraint for life-history evolution. We show that for a range of very simple life histories, Darwinian fitness is equal to birth rate minus death rate. So, natural selection maximizes birth and production rates and minimizes death rates. This implies that decreased body size will generally be favored because it increases production, so long as mortality is unaffected. Alternatively, increased body size will be favored only if it decreases mortality or enhances reproductive success sufficiently to override the preexisting production constraint. Adaptations that may favor evolution of larger size include niche shifts that decrease mortality by escaping predation or that increase fecundity by exploiting new abundant food sources. These principles can be generalized to better understand the intimate relationship between the genetic currency of evolution and the metabolic currency of ecology.
引用
收藏
页码:17595 / 17599
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: Assessing Rensch's rule [J].
Abouheif, E ;
Fairbairn, DJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1997, 149 (03) :540-562
[2]
Cope's rule and the dynamics of body mass evolution in North American fossil mammals [J].
Alroy, J .
SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5364) :731-734
[3]
Do amphibians follow Bergmann's rule? [J].
Ashton, KG .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 2002, 80 (04) :708-716
[4]
TEMPERATURE AND ORGANISM SIZE - A BIOLOGICAL LAW FOR ECTOTHERMS [J].
ATKINSON, D .
ADVANCES IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, VOL 25, 1994, 25 :1-58
[5]
Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle [J].
Atkinson, D ;
Sibly, RM .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1997, 12 (06) :235-239
[6]
Bergmann C., 1847, GOTTINGER STUDIEN, V3, P595
[7]
Brown J. H., 1995, Macroecology
[8]
EVOLUTION OF BODY-SIZE - CONSEQUENCES OF AN ENERGETIC DEFINITION OF FITNESS [J].
BROWN, JH ;
MARQUET, PA ;
TAPER, ML .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1993, 142 (04) :573-584
[9]
Brown JH, 2004, ECOLOGY, V85, P1771, DOI 10.1890/03-9000
[10]
Calder W. A., 1984, SIZE FUNCTION LIFE H